Proof the fatal shot came from somewhere else other then the rear

[Tom Scully]

...What this shows me is that the alteration of the Z-film was considerably more sophisticated than just the removal of frames. .....One of the earliest corroborative pieces would be Earlene Roberts and both landlords swearing up and down that the Dallas police were at their place just after 1:30. That would be before Oswald's actual arrest. However the official record has Bill Alexander showing up with the warrant a little after 4pm. These photographic alterations we're looking at, are not simple - they take time, they have to be possibly repeated once or twice before they're gotten right... and to do that on an 8-mm film would have taken a bit of expertise and quite a bit of specialized equipment, back in 1963. Brugione is quite clear about the chain of custody in his interview, his job was apparently to make presentation boards but there was another team with perhaps a different purpose from which he was excluded. He talks specifically about seeing a "big chunk" of Kennedy's skull about three to four feet in the air above Kennedy's head, on the reel he worked on - which is of course missing from the public version.

Brian,

I wrote a detailed response to your post but this site logged me out before I clicked "submit reply", and I lost all of the text. I strongly disagree with everything I've quoted from your post, if my ability to support my protests will carry any weight with you.

When it comes to film and photo "evidence," I already told you I try not to go there. When I read the word, "alteration," all I can see is the word, "Fetzer". I post with my real name, so what I present matters to me as if I
was saying it face to face.
I did quite a bit on the troubling shortcomings of the "testimony" of Earline Roberts and her employers, Mr. and Mrs. A. C. Johnson. Unfortunately, what I shared was suddenly deleted by your buddy and mine, Duncan Hines.

Here is a reaction to my work on the topic.:

Tom Scully Said:

Question for David von Pein [sic]....

Do you think the time observations of the witnesses you have criticized were any less credible than Gladys Johnson claiming she first talked to OH Lee about three weeks before she said she rented a room to him on 14 Oct., and that Lee told her during that first encounter that he wanted to be near his work? What work. (both Gladys and husband A.C. testified DPD detective arrived about 2:00 pm, they were a full hour off.....)

Or the 1:04 time fix of Earline [sic] Roberts who also stated in early December that police had arrived about thirty minutes after Oswald departed. DPD detective Potts established in his testimony that he and other officers arrived at 3:00 pm....Fritz said he first began to question LHO at @2:25 and then sent Potts and other detectives to 1026, and Potts telephoned him to say the register only showed H.O. Lee

I had highlighted all of the relevant testimony in the post I just attempted and lost when I was logged out.

IMO, the key to support what I am saying, aside from the solid testimony of Potts, is the time Oswald's image
was first broadcast on local television.:

JFKCountercoup2: Oswald Interrogatons Time Line

jfkcountercoup2.blogspot.com/2013/10/oswald-interrogatons-time-line.h...


Oct 5, 2013 - 877-936. Oswald's Interrogation Timeline ... 3:10 pm WFAA Dallas broadcasts first photo of Oswald and identifies him as a suspect. 3:15 pm ...

http://insidethearrb.livejournal.com/12109.html
......
The star of the video is former CIA employee Dino Brugioni, whom I interviewed at length in 2011 in HD video, thanks to Peter Janney, who paid for the film crew and arranged access to Dino.......
...........Although 91 years old at the time of the interview, I found Dino to be lucid and completely trustworthy. His memory was extremely sharp and he was "as honest as the day is long."
.........
Watch this video---examine the evidence, and assess Dino Brugioni's credibility yourself---and make up your own mind about what it means.

Doug Horne

My experience with Janney and Horne was that they behaved no better than carnival barkers. They seemed quite
resistant to research that is proven but contradicts their belief system.

I recall warning you to lightly weigh witness sourced "facts" and more so for single source witnesses recalling fifty year old events with 90 year old brains. My father is close to Dino's age and his faculties are intact. This summer, he recalled the last name of his neighbor next door when he was 11 years old and details of the family that I then verified via ancestry.com. He presents no signs of dementia, but my memories of events I have knowledge of are often different than his when we compare them.

Pick your shots carefully, Brian, and I'd be happy to debate you, re: the assumptions you posted, or to answer any questions prompted by your reading this post.