28-10-2015, 02:19 PM
Quote:Drew Phipps Wrote:Ken Garretson Wrote:I don't assume that the perpetrators intended to conceal the demolition.
Why then would they bother with the 19 hijacker story?
Forgive me, I don't understand your question. Are you saying the hijackings are a story (that they didn't happen)? Are you assuming the perpetrators are the same as the story tellers?
Maybe I'm missing something obvious in your question.
I'm asking, if the perpetrators of these "explosions" didn't intend to conceal their involvement, why would they bother with planes and hijackers, etc. Why not just openly use a military issue bomb of some sort?
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."