Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Impossible to refute evidence the BYPs are composites - this is a done deal
#1
Ever since the Dartmouth/Farid charade I've been trying to find definitive proof the BYPs are composites which removes subjectivity from the equation.

What rules of physics are being broken in these images which renders them impossible as "original" and cannot be refuted based onopinion or POV.

First thing we need do is look at how SHADOWS and LIGHT work.

Basic rule - The shadows of multiple objects will always converge in the opposite direction of the shadow at its light source.
The shadows can NEVER converge behind the subject since the rays created will continue out in different directions. This is not to be confused with the images Vanishing point.

The rule requires the shadow to be cast on a flat surface since anything else will skew the shadow slightly or greatly depending on the object (a shadow on the ground and up a wall is a great example)

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7624&stc=1]


So, in the BYPs any shadows cast on the ground behind the subjects will ALL converge back to the source of light... They MUST as this is a basic law of the behavior of light.

Now let's look at the two key shadows in the BYPs - Oswald and the stairway post next to him

As we can see in the top left, the shadows behave exactly the same as in the above example... FROM the lightsource they radiate in different directions yet converge back at the horiszon under the lightsource

The shadows of the post and items to the left of the post facing the image exhibit a shadow which is from a light source further to the left than the Oswald shadow since it is being cast in the opposite direction than it should be.


[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7625&stc=1]



The manner in which the shadow of this post falls in not consistent with the SAME SOURCE of light for the Oswald shadow.
If anything, the post shadow and nose shadow fall in the same direction suggesting the post and to the left and Oswald's face were photographed at the same time while the body and rest of the image was not.

The Evidence remains the Conspiracy...
DJ

[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7626&stc=1]


Attached Files
.jpg   Shadow example.jpg (Size: 216.34 KB / Downloads: 90)
.jpg   how light and shadow works.jpg (Size: 861.71 KB / Downloads: 92)
.jpg   Large 133-A Backyard photo - shadow convergence analysis.jpg (Size: 538.57 KB / Downloads: 87)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right.....
R. Hunter
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Impossible to refute evidence the BYPs are composites - this is a done deal - by David Josephs - 28-10-2015, 08:48 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Stancak Posts False Prayer Man Evidence On Education Forum Brian Doyle 4 2,753 29-11-2024, 12:44 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  The Fiber Evidence Gil Jesus 0 1,185 10-06-2024, 11:49 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part V/Conclusion Gil Jesus 0 1,399 05-03-2024, 02:07 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part IV / The X-Rays Gil Jesus 0 1,314 02-03-2024, 02:16 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --Part III: The Autopsy Photos Gil Jesus 0 1,435 27-02-2024, 01:40 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part II / The Exit Wound Gil Jesus 0 1,381 14-02-2024, 01:31 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Evidence of a Frontal Shot --- Part I / The Entry Wound Gil Jesus 0 1,388 06-02-2024, 02:32 PM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  NO Evidence Gil Jesus 3 2,953 31-07-2023, 03:44 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Evidence of Witness Tampering in the case against Oswald Gil Jesus 0 1,884 28-07-2023, 11:31 AM
Last Post: Gil Jesus
  Detailed discussion and analysis of the H&L evidence David Josephs 105 326,011 24-08-2020, 03:26 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)