28-10-2015, 08:48 PM
Ever since the Dartmouth/Farid charade I've been trying to find definitive proof the BYPs are composites which removes subjectivity from the equation.
What rules of physics are being broken in these images which renders them impossible as "original" and cannot be refuted based onopinion or POV.
First thing we need do is look at how SHADOWS and LIGHT work.
Basic rule - The shadows of multiple objects will always converge in the opposite direction of the shadow at its light source.
The shadows can NEVER converge behind the subject since the rays created will continue out in different directions. This is not to be confused with the images Vanishing point.
The rule requires the shadow to be cast on a flat surface since anything else will skew the shadow slightly or greatly depending on the object (a shadow on the ground and up a wall is a great example)
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7624&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7624&stc=1)
So, in the BYPs any shadows cast on the ground behind the subjects will ALL converge back to the source of light... They MUST as this is a basic law of the behavior of light.
Now let's look at the two key shadows in the BYPs - Oswald and the stairway post next to him
As we can see in the top left, the shadows behave exactly the same as in the above example... FROM the lightsource they radiate in different directions yet converge back at the horiszon under the lightsource
The shadows of the post and items to the left of the post facing the image exhibit a shadow which is from a light source further to the left than the Oswald shadow since it is being cast in the opposite direction than it should be.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7625&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7625&stc=1)
The manner in which the shadow of this post falls in not consistent with the SAME SOURCE of light for the Oswald shadow.
If anything, the post shadow and nose shadow fall in the same direction suggesting the post and to the left and Oswald's face were photographed at the same time while the body and rest of the image was not.
The Evidence remains the Conspiracy...
DJ
What rules of physics are being broken in these images which renders them impossible as "original" and cannot be refuted based onopinion or POV.
First thing we need do is look at how SHADOWS and LIGHT work.
Basic rule - The shadows of multiple objects will always converge in the opposite direction of the shadow at its light source.
The shadows can NEVER converge behind the subject since the rays created will continue out in different directions. This is not to be confused with the images Vanishing point.
The rule requires the shadow to be cast on a flat surface since anything else will skew the shadow slightly or greatly depending on the object (a shadow on the ground and up a wall is a great example)
So, in the BYPs any shadows cast on the ground behind the subjects will ALL converge back to the source of light... They MUST as this is a basic law of the behavior of light.
Now let's look at the two key shadows in the BYPs - Oswald and the stairway post next to him
As we can see in the top left, the shadows behave exactly the same as in the above example... FROM the lightsource they radiate in different directions yet converge back at the horiszon under the lightsource
The shadows of the post and items to the left of the post facing the image exhibit a shadow which is from a light source further to the left than the Oswald shadow since it is being cast in the opposite direction than it should be.
The manner in which the shadow of this post falls in not consistent with the SAME SOURCE of light for the Oswald shadow.
If anything, the post shadow and nose shadow fall in the same direction suggesting the post and to the left and Oswald's face were photographed at the same time while the body and rest of the image was not.
The Evidence remains the Conspiracy...
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter

