Proof the fatal shot came from somewhere else other then the rear

[David Josephs]

Well said, Mr. Joseph, three shots is what was merely settled upon. An actual account would given credence to why so many witnesses describe shots coming bunched together as oppose to in 2.3 sec intervals (FBI determination of bolt action sequencing on a Mannlicher-Carcano). Those charged with investigating this matter couldn't count higher than three otherwise there'd be little choice but to include multiple shooters, which IMHO lay in ambush to murder an unarmed democratically elected representative of the people.

Thanks Alan....

In fact, most who analyzed the film stated it was not possible for the bullet that went thru JC's torso was the same as the bullet the destroyed his wrist.


April22, 1964

MEMORANDUMFOR THE RECORD

FROM: Melvin A. Eisenberg

SUBJECT: Conference of April 21, 1964, to determinewhich
frames in the Zapruder movies show theimpact of
the first and second bullets.

----------------------------------------------------------

On Tuesday, April 21, 1964, a conferencewas held to determine
whichframes in the Zapruder film portray the instants at which the
firstand second bullets struck.

<snip>
Ina discussion after the conference, Drs. Light and Dolce
expressedthemselves as being very strongly of the opinion that
Connallyhad been hit by two different bullets, principally on the
groundthat the bullet recovered from Connally's stretcher could not
havebroken his radius without having suffered more distortion. Dr.
Oliverwithheld a conclusion until he has had the opportunity to make
tests on animal tissue and bone with the actualrifle.

I like how the following can include "Other possibilities" for the shots... and they too are confused how LIFE placed the first two shots.

We have shots possible at 190, 206, 213, 242, 264 & 313... with no analysis of anything past 313.