06-11-2015, 10:59 PM
As your own images amply show, shadows, which are actually exactly parallel to each other, can appear (by virtue of perspective) to converge or diverge visibly over the space of a few inches or a few feet. It is a mistake to declare that shadows in the BYP that appear to converge constitute "impossible to refute" evidence of a composite photo.
You want to prove this to yourself? Take a photo at eye level of some shadows of parallel vertical objects. Then immediately take the same photograph from a prone position and compare the shadows.
You want to prove this to yourself? Take a photo at eye level of some shadows of parallel vertical objects. Then immediately take the same photograph from a prone position and compare the shadows.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."