16-11-2015, 04:57 PM
Tom Scully Wrote:I will take questions,
I have a question....
Since it is clear from the reports you copied here that by March '63 Dallas Postal Money Orders were pre-punched with rectangular holes representing the individual serial number of the money order and punched at the time of issuance with round holes representing the its value, why is there no bank endorsement, date stamp, or any other mark indicating that the infamous Hidell money order was processed by a bank--any bank?
Designers of the negotiable instrument itself clearly anticipated the appearance of bank stamps during processing, since "BANK STAMPS" are mentioned in the legalese on the back of the document. Where are these stamps? John Armstrong has been asking that question for a long time.
Thank you for the additional documents. John A. is going to work at least one of them into an expansion of his writeup on the money order.
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996