12-12-2015, 06:51 AM
I believe Kubrik's wife is still alive and could go a long way to resolving this.
Given many of the anomalies Jack White and others pointed out, I think that at least some [one or two?] of the manned missions might have been faked - but that others likely were NOT.
The silence of the Soviets/Russians and other major powers on this [who could track if a craft landed and returned or not and also monitor if voice and telemetry signals were present] is disturbing.
Yes, there are Moon rocks naturally on the earth, but there are also what I believe to be actual Moon rock samples returned from the moon by NASA craft. They do have slightly different isotopic signatures and slightly different ratios of some rare elements.
Everyone obviously sees what they want in this Moon Rorschach test. What is needed is a definitive study by unbiased researchers and scientists.
Several of the astronauts that 'went to the Moon' developed severe mental problems and depression. While it could be for other reasons, it might be related to this potential fraud.
I don't think even Hubble has the resolving power to see a lander on the Moon, let alone footprints.
I'm not convinced by what others have pointed out as 'coaching' of responses. Kubrick is filmed poorly in the dark, and the sound is poor...but it does look to me like him in a haggard state. Voice analysis programs and facial recognition programs could do better than our guesses. Lastly, I'd like to see the 88 page non-disclosure statement and hear from the lawyer[s] and others who must have been aware of this....especially Kubrick's wife - and children or relatives. If he would go to the trouble of having some up and coming young filmmaker sign a huge NDS and wait 15 years after his death, I'd think he [Kubrick] would have also left some real proofs [photos or videos of the set and production showing set, lights, crews, cameras, wires, etc.] with someone, somewhere. Absent those coming to the fore, I'd be a bit skeptical, but lets see what shakes out now that it has hit the fan.
Filming such a hoax takes a large crew, model builders, a set; i.e. there would be MANY other witnesses out there. Did they also have to sign NDS? It would be nice if several came forward with proofs. Without that, it will always remain in the gray area where no resolution can be reached and everyone will see what they want to see; believe what they want to believe.
Given many of the anomalies Jack White and others pointed out, I think that at least some [one or two?] of the manned missions might have been faked - but that others likely were NOT.
The silence of the Soviets/Russians and other major powers on this [who could track if a craft landed and returned or not and also monitor if voice and telemetry signals were present] is disturbing.
Yes, there are Moon rocks naturally on the earth, but there are also what I believe to be actual Moon rock samples returned from the moon by NASA craft. They do have slightly different isotopic signatures and slightly different ratios of some rare elements.
Everyone obviously sees what they want in this Moon Rorschach test. What is needed is a definitive study by unbiased researchers and scientists.
Several of the astronauts that 'went to the Moon' developed severe mental problems and depression. While it could be for other reasons, it might be related to this potential fraud.
I don't think even Hubble has the resolving power to see a lander on the Moon, let alone footprints.
I'm not convinced by what others have pointed out as 'coaching' of responses. Kubrick is filmed poorly in the dark, and the sound is poor...but it does look to me like him in a haggard state. Voice analysis programs and facial recognition programs could do better than our guesses. Lastly, I'd like to see the 88 page non-disclosure statement and hear from the lawyer[s] and others who must have been aware of this....especially Kubrick's wife - and children or relatives. If he would go to the trouble of having some up and coming young filmmaker sign a huge NDS and wait 15 years after his death, I'd think he [Kubrick] would have also left some real proofs [photos or videos of the set and production showing set, lights, crews, cameras, wires, etc.] with someone, somewhere. Absent those coming to the fore, I'd be a bit skeptical, but lets see what shakes out now that it has hit the fan.
Filming such a hoax takes a large crew, model builders, a set; i.e. there would be MANY other witnesses out there. Did they also have to sign NDS? It would be nice if several came forward with proofs. Without that, it will always remain in the gray area where no resolution can be reached and everyone will see what they want to see; believe what they want to believe.
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass