07-01-2016, 07:10 AM
Mr. Hargrove,
You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.
Please take down your link to your web page displaying my unattributed original research details here and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of my original research, and images I am the original presenter of, from your web pages.
For comparison:
http://jfk.education/node/11 and http://jfk.education/node/13
Late 1950's - early 1960's automated check processing innovation.:
http://jfk.education/node/12
Throughout this process, from about November 1, 2015, this research has been collaborative, co-operative, and presented in a team like spirit, your new presentation being a disturbing exception.....
Shortly after my November 10, initial presentation of my original research, google.com news archive dropped access to Palm Beach Post articles, of which the one I presented an image of, was one.:
https://sites.google.com/site/palmbeachc...newspapers vs.
https://news.google.com/newspapers#P
It seems this change by google.com left you no alternative than to include the article image file from my presentation (just one small example) , cropped by you, but with my unique red highlighting visible.:
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=7905&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=7905&stc=1)
When I originally presented this research on this forum, David Joseph reacted by launching a competing thread, directed at David Von Pein
who merely recounted, with attribution, the original research of Lance
Payette and myself.
presenting obsolete information which you enthusiastically posted in.:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...o3_loShe78
I do not see how your efforts conform to presentation of the most accurate information as soon as possible because I understand no higher priority than promptly attempting to present the most accurate and A.S.A.P. components, and always in good faith, giving credit where credit is due.
You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.
Please take down your link to your web page displaying my unattributed original research details here and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of my original research, and images I am the original presenter of, from your web pages.
For comparison:
http://jfk.education/node/11 and http://jfk.education/node/13
Late 1950's - early 1960's automated check processing innovation.:
http://jfk.education/node/12
Throughout this process, from about November 1, 2015, this research has been collaborative, co-operative, and presented in a team like spirit, your new presentation being a disturbing exception.....
Quote:http://jfk.education/node/11Sorry Brian, Jean, and DVP, Banks Did Not Key-Punch 1963 P.O. Money Orders
Submitted by Admin on Tue, 11/10/2015 - 06:47
Updated November 19, 2015:
https://www.computer.org/csdl/proceeding...680479.pdf
(Lance Payette brought this to my attention, today. "File Locator Numbers - See Explanation, below
https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1...4873&hl=en
...........
Shortly after my November 10, initial presentation of my original research, google.com news archive dropped access to Palm Beach Post articles, of which the one I presented an image of, was one.:
https://sites.google.com/site/palmbeachc...newspapers vs.
https://news.google.com/newspapers#P
It seems this change by google.com left you no alternative than to include the article image file from my presentation (just one small example) , cropped by you, but with my unique red highlighting visible.:
When I originally presented this research on this forum, David Joseph reacted by launching a competing thread, directed at David Von Pein
who merely recounted, with attribution, the original research of Lance
Payette and myself.
presenting obsolete information which you enthusiastically posted in.:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...o3_loShe78
I do not see how your efforts conform to presentation of the most accurate information as soon as possible because I understand no higher priority than promptly attempting to present the most accurate and A.S.A.P. components, and always in good faith, giving credit where credit is due.
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.