Thoughts on a bus trip

[David Josephs]

Just making your case even stronger I see, Mr. Joseph.

Officialdom would have the public believe the wrongfully accused not only tossed one coat away that day...but now two?!

They said he discarded a tan/white one near 10th and Patton (right!).

Mrs. Roberts saw him void of a Blue coat, soooo, Where on earth did the Blue coat disappear to? It didn't disappear. The wrongfully accused simply never wore a Blue coat. It's rightful owner, someone much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused--given Mr. McWatter's testimony, simply wore it.

This person--Blue coat man-- could have been an unwitting participate in a much more elaborate scheme, simply charged with boarding the bus in question, securing a bus transfer and then returning it to a party(ies) unknown, without even realizing the full significance of his adventure (we use to do a lot of this many moons ago, sending parties out to perform a specific segment of an assignment, compartmentalized in essence from the larger picture. For instance, on the surface, we'll say something like the City doesn't trust Employee A down in the Treasurer's Office, so take this amount in cash down to his/her office to pay off this or that. The larger picture, unbeknownst to the assignee, is the bills are marked for later identification by the Treasurer's immediate supervisor, who produced the bills in the first place. It's not frivolous to imagine someone could have been fed the same albeit bogus claim about McWatters, without even knowing the full implications of his activities that day).

Of course, Blue coat man could also have been an active participate in the framing of the wrongfully accused, with a limited/minor role, yet significant enough to help build a bogus case against him.

Mr. McWatter's sworn testimony--as shared by Mr. Joseph--demonstrates someone in a blue coat, much taller and heavier than the wrongfully accused was on his bus, who sought and secured a bus transfer that afternoon.

Thanks to my friend John Armstrong we may speculate that the Blue coated man was LEE at 5'10" 150-165 and impersonating Harvey to add confusion. and Yes, Lee would need to be wearing a LEE bracelet and Marine ring which is not too far a stretch given his name is Lee and he was in the marines.

Does that medium sized light colored zippered jacket look familiar? (I happen to agree with John. There is a proponderance of evidence which illustrates the existence of 2 different people known as Lee Harvey Oswald and that LEE, the taller natural born Southerner was recruited and used within the CIA's fight against Cuba)







Mr. BALL. I have here an exhibit, Commission Exhibit 162, a jacket. Did you ever see this before?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No; I did not.
Mr. BALL. Does it look like, anything like, the jacket the man had on?
Mrs. MARKHAM. It is short, open down the front. But that jacket it is a darker jacket than that, I know it was.
Mr. BALL. You don't think it was as light a jacket as that?
Mrs. MARKHAM. No, it was darker than that, I know it was. At that moment I was so excited


Mr. BALL. I show you Commission Exhibit 162, do you recognize that?
Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.