15-01-2016, 01:22 AM
Quote: :: a rousing standing O, Mr. Joseph.
Also, what a very telling choice of words ---> Our intention is not to establish the point with completeaccuracy,
but merely to substantiate the hypothesis which underlies theconclusions that Oswald was the sole assassin.
Translation, we are here to rubber stamp the whitewash, rather than actually evaluate actual evidence to the contrary....
underLIES
And I left out what may be the most interesting of the statements.
"I should add that the facts which we now have in our possession, submitted to us in separate reports from the FBI and Secret Service, are totally incorrect and, if left uncorrected, will present a completely misleading picture."
So Alan, at this point in time, April 1964, what do you suppose "the completely misleading picture" which was presented by the FBI and SS, was and what needed correction - the actual evidence or the story desired to be told?
The SBT was just being formulated based on the neck wound being accepted as an exit wound. Tague shows up in June/July.
It was after this letter, in May 1964 that the FBI got the surveyor Robert West to change his drawings to only show 2 shots....
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...t-not-Z313 is a thread here where we've been discussing this.
I don't mean to mix threads - I only use this as illustration of the extent of deception employed and my incredulity at those who want to argue that specific items related to Oswald's guilt are genuine and authentic items of evidence rather than planted junk which the WC, FBI and CIA believed would never be examined by anyone.
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter