Analysis of NPIC Briefing Boards

[David Josephs]

The question this begs is what was the second team told to do when they made the new set of panels and how did they do it?

The group on Sunday was not aware of the Saturday group's work - as you said, departmentalized.

So to them (Homer McMahon et al) they were taking the film given to them and creating briefing boards - so nothing was "new" to them.

===================


Adam -

I think the more important aspect of that page one NPIC stuff are the 2 questions at the top...

Why 18.3 not 16fps and the top right - how did LIFE know the exact frames of the 1st and 2nd shot?


The answer is they were told to work backward from Z313, not to identify shots as seen on the film for the film they were reviewing had virtually all the shots except behind the sign and what we know as Z313... removed

Dino said he saw 4-6 shots from at least 3 directions in his review of it (if I remember correctly)

Then, instead of using the location of JFK himself, the FBI & SS alternated between the front and rear bumpers when they performed their location analysis...
(Note: with a 21 foot limo, the rear of the limo as marked in one spot compared to the front of the limo in another effective removes 42 feet of distance.
the shot further down Elm as shown in WCD298 was made to disappear by using math, having WEST change his survey and the fraud offered as CE884 & CE875)


Over time and thanks to Tague and Walthers - the 3 shot conclusion of the FBI & SS from January 20, 1964 was changed to 2 by the end of May, 1964.

And the third shot some 40 feet further down Elm disappears... I've started a 3 part article on WCD298 at ctka.net, if interested in investigating further.

btw - without the help of Tom Purvis and Chris Davidson, much of this would remain a mystery.

DJ