01-02-2016, 05:27 PM
Bob....
Can you explain how it is you can use the results of THAT autopsy to conclude anything?
The track was never dissected or examined from either side
The hole they described was amzaingly small at only a few mm's
It was at a spot below the level of the shirt collar so if it came from the front it had to go thru that area...
unless Rankin's comment about what is shown in the FIRST autopsy report which they are looking at yet never made it to the final "version"
If there are at least 2 if not three different versions of the autopsy - with them offering a 1500cc weight for a brain half gone - I find the best we can do is illustrate what we have in evidence and then decide if that matches the Parkland/Dealeay scenario. We know his description of the head wounds are not consistent with what we have in evidence prior to Bethesda...
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in regards to the wound and theautopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the bullet in the front of theneck, and that all has to be developed much more than we have at the presenttime.
We have[B] an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragmentcame out the front of the neck, but [/B]with the elevation the shot must have comefrom, and the angle, it seems quite apparent, since we have the picture ofwhere the bullet entered in the back, that the bullet entered below theshoulder blade to the right of the backbone, which is below the place where thepicture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt in front, andthe bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, thatparticular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went in a finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
Can you explain how it is you can use the results of THAT autopsy to conclude anything?
The track was never dissected or examined from either side
The hole they described was amzaingly small at only a few mm's
It was at a spot below the level of the shirt collar so if it came from the front it had to go thru that area...
unless Rankin's comment about what is shown in the FIRST autopsy report which they are looking at yet never made it to the final "version"
If there are at least 2 if not three different versions of the autopsy - with them offering a 1500cc weight for a brain half gone - I find the best we can do is illustrate what we have in evidence and then decide if that matches the Parkland/Dealeay scenario. We know his description of the head wounds are not consistent with what we have in evidence prior to Bethesda...
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in regards to the wound and theautopsy and this point of exit or entrance of the bullet in the front of theneck, and that all has to be developed much more than we have at the presenttime.
We have[B] an explanation there in the autopsy that probably a fragmentcame out the front of the neck, but [/B]with the elevation the shot must have comefrom, and the angle, it seems quite apparent, since we have the picture ofwhere the bullet entered in the back, that the bullet entered below theshoulder blade to the right of the backbone, which is below the place where thepicture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt in front, andthe bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike any bone at all, thatparticular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went in a finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter