01-02-2016, 05:50 PM
I'd like to respectfully disagree about Janney being lumped in with Cinque and Fetzer. I think there's many people who believe and respect Peter Janney and his attempt to expose Mary Meyer's obvious CIA assassination. Frankly, I don't think they should be subjected to any attempt to marginalize their credibility by being thrown in to the Fetzer hamper because they recognize the credibility of Janney's effort. It is my personal opinion that Jim over-reaches here and risks denying a serious victim.
I also think Jim may not have thought hard enough on Gary Webb. He would do himself well to familiarize himself with the full capabilities of CIA and realize they have the ability to drive someone to suicide and make it look like it was done solely by the victim. Just because Fetzer backs something doesn't necessarily make it wrong (though you are going against the odds when it comes to Fetzer).
Jim covers Israel's involvement in too limited terms. A read of Piper's book Final Judgment and its highly detailed evidence, that involves 500 pages of serious DiEugenio-level detail, will show why Jim's simple propaganda-level dismissal doesn't live up to that complex detail that involves Permindex, Tibor Rosenbaum's BCCI bank, The French Connection, and the US mob's connection to CIA that was directly connected to the main assassination players. Most people haven't read Final Judgment so they don't realize what Jim is ignoring. An avenue into this is to analyze the USS Liberty incident. Saying "no reputable researchers claim this" is tantamount to what the NY Times does to Jim himself.
It's easy to criticize Fetzer since most assassination researchers realize he's gone off the reservation. However I find it unsound to attach personally disliked assassination claims to Fetzer in order to disparage them. Just sayin'.
Greg Parker is one of the most uncredible researchers out there. He is a rabid anti-Armstrong theorist. His ROKC website is a troll-infested farce.
.
I also think Jim may not have thought hard enough on Gary Webb. He would do himself well to familiarize himself with the full capabilities of CIA and realize they have the ability to drive someone to suicide and make it look like it was done solely by the victim. Just because Fetzer backs something doesn't necessarily make it wrong (though you are going against the odds when it comes to Fetzer).
Jim covers Israel's involvement in too limited terms. A read of Piper's book Final Judgment and its highly detailed evidence, that involves 500 pages of serious DiEugenio-level detail, will show why Jim's simple propaganda-level dismissal doesn't live up to that complex detail that involves Permindex, Tibor Rosenbaum's BCCI bank, The French Connection, and the US mob's connection to CIA that was directly connected to the main assassination players. Most people haven't read Final Judgment so they don't realize what Jim is ignoring. An avenue into this is to analyze the USS Liberty incident. Saying "no reputable researchers claim this" is tantamount to what the NY Times does to Jim himself.
It's easy to criticize Fetzer since most assassination researchers realize he's gone off the reservation. However I find it unsound to attach personally disliked assassination claims to Fetzer in order to disparage them. Just sayin'.
Greg Parker is one of the most uncredible researchers out there. He is a rabid anti-Armstrong theorist. His ROKC website is a troll-infested farce.
.