Deep Politics Forum › Deep Politics Forum › JFK Assassination v
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Linear Mode
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams
Peter Lemkin Offline
Administrator
*******
Posts: 16,120
Threads: 1,776
Likes Received: 1 in 1 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2008
#14
26-09-2009, 07:34 AM (This post was last modified: 26-09-2009, 11:30 AM by Peter Lemkin.)
http://www.blackopradio.com/archives2009.html

I was wrong. It was a TKO in the first round! Oh, well.....in a way, it is almost sad to....no pathetic...to see someone try to defend the official version of the magic show in Dallas on 11/22/63 - complete with disappearing acts; diversions of attention of the audience's focus; hidden devices to pull off the performance; stage props; backstage accomplices; hawkers; shills; et al....they even had thieves pickpocketing the National audience of their democracy during and after the 'performance'.

Is it just me, or is the link not working to part II?
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
Find
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by John Geraghty - 24-09-2009, 12:57 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Magda Hassan - 24-09-2009, 01:11 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 24-09-2009, 04:07 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 24-09-2009, 09:09 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 24-09-2009, 10:01 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 24-09-2009, 10:16 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Myra Bronstein - 25-09-2009, 05:55 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 25-09-2009, 07:29 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Myra Bronstein - 25-09-2009, 07:48 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 25-09-2009, 08:19 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 25-09-2009, 08:19 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 04:05 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 04:11 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 07:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 26-09-2009, 10:39 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 27-09-2009, 06:33 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 27-09-2009, 01:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 08:42 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 08:49 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 09:11 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 27-09-2009, 09:40 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 28-09-2009, 06:34 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 28-09-2009, 06:55 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 28-09-2009, 07:04 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 28-09-2009, 07:20 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by John Kelin - 28-09-2009, 03:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 29-09-2009, 06:33 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 02:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 30-09-2009, 06:21 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Jack White - 30-09-2009, 07:45 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 10:50 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 10:59 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 11:22 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 30-09-2009, 11:25 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Gil Jesus - 30-09-2009, 11:27 PM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Charles Drago - 01-10-2009, 12:00 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Bernice Moore - 01-10-2009, 12:05 AM
Debate: DiEugenio v McAdams - by Peter Lemkin - 26-09-2009, 07:34 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Jim DiEugenio: Not to be Trusted Richard Gilbride 24 3,087 27-12-2024, 06:08 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio On "The Loser's Club" Brian Doyle 0 459 30-12-2023, 07:06 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Reviews Kamp's Book But Doesn't Mention Prayer Man Brian Doyle 0 602 06-10-2023, 02:54 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Betrays Deep Politics Forum Over Prayer Man Brian Doyle 4 1,106 05-10-2023, 05:11 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Gives Reference To ROKC Troll Farm And Kamp Brian Doyle 0 597 09-08-2023, 03:02 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  DiEugenio Betrays Conspiracy Research Brian Doyle 1 781 07-07-2023, 04:32 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Jim DiEugenio Reviews The House of Kennedy Jim DiEugenio 0 2,411 26-04-2020, 06:50 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 7,959 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Denial of Justice reviewed by Jim DiEugenio Jim DiEugenio 4 4,199 23-05-2019, 10:35 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Jim DiEugenio Critiques CNN's American Dynasties Jim DiEugenio 0 14,088 20-07-2018, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)