05-02-2016, 05:55 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote:Albert Doyle Wrote:Doesn't a nuclear explosion leave radioactivity?
Wouldn't a nuclear explosion at the bedrock base of the Tower have kinetically collapsed the building at that point? And doesn't this contradict the planted demolition charges theory?
We must keep in mind that we can only speculate about what kind of high-tech weapons the Pentagon and others have available to them today. Stuff that may sound like science fiction, but might be made public only 20 years from now.
Which doesn't really answer the point that such a device, if set off at the bedrock level, would have collapsed the towers from the base and not the upper areas as was seen.
Oh yes. I was just talking generally about this whole subject of "what brought the towers down?"