20-02-2016, 11:20 PM
Alan Ford Wrote:With a tip of the hat to Mr. Hargrove (Jim), for caring enough about the research community to sound the alarm, please be aware folks that your comments may be in jeopardy of conveying more or less than what you are actually sharing, given the less than forthcoming tactics shared here --Ã
http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....opic=22690
[FONT=&]Given that anonymous "Guest" are allowed to read content here, one never really knows if the same tactics shared above leaves your integrity here subject to the same manipulation. Each of you have a right to have your research shared in the true essence of your genuine intent, void of something akin to a gutless sucker punch. It's one thing to openly challenge a fellow researcher in a fair & square manner...it's less than honest to do otherwise. IF the wrongfully accused really is guilty as we have been lied to, err, told, why would anyone need to doctor the proceedings?
[/FONT]
Alan,
You're up in arms as Hargrove sounds the alarm! Every comment copied is attributed, isn't it? On the other hand.... I am the only source of this portion of this "page"......but...:
Tom Scully Wrote:......
BTW, I am the sole unique source of the research that influenced John Armstrong and Jim Hargrove to submit this "revision" to you, or to your webmaster, and as you can see, it is published on your site, attributed to the "work" of John Armstrong.:
http://www.ctka.net/2016/ArmstrongMa...ey_Orders.html
Kindly take it down, the portion of the page in the screenshot above consists entirely of two images I selected and presented, and my exact, unique
research details in the text directly above and below the two images. First I was ignored, then attempts were made to discredit both me and my research details, and then my unique research was appropriated and credited to the individual I proved was presenting inaccurate conclusions....
I hope the irony (hypocrisy) is not lost on you, Alan.
Quote:http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....5&p=325992
Jim Hargrove - February 19, 2016
......
DVP is NOT going to argue JA's article, Jim. Thanks much for hosting it!!!
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.