Afternoon, Mr. Kaiser
First, so there is no misunderstanding here, your right to stand your ground is a given. Now, without making light of your right to do so (certainly not my intent, but communication online is void of eye contact and facial expressions, etc., so to be clear the following comments have nothing to do with disagreeing with the position you have taken on who went where and who met with this person or that person).
However, in fairness to the legacy of President John F. Kennedy's position on the ill-advised war in Vietnam given by those knee-jerk, blood thirsty hawks over at the Pentagon, it's a matter of public record (whether through his public speeches, EO's, etc.,) that the president was trying to avoid the slippery-slope those no good warmongers pushed him toward.
In fact, the final straw for those warmongering hawks IMHO was the president's smart move of reversal in Vietnam; but where they could forgive him for their own debacle at the Bay of Pigs; and, his calm, cool and collected handling of the Cuban Missiles crisis, those entrenched hawks embedded deeply within the machinery of the Military Industrial Complex just couldn't allow the young whippersnapper in their little minds show them the right way to engage humanity any further.
President John F. Kennedy was a man of peace, someone who simply wanted to adopt the old sensible doctrine of 'Walk Softly, But Carry A BIG Stick", but those no good for nothing warmongers just had to have their damn war didn't they?! f#$$$$@ clowns.
That said, Mr. Kaiser, I want you to know your right to hold your own position on who went where and who met this person or that person or not isn't my issue here with you. Carry on sir. Enjoy your day. Cheers!
The audacity of those %$#%@ clowns over on E Street and over at the Pentagon (Mr. Kennedy wasn't even at fault for their self made debacle at the BOP, but yet these lying treasonous cowards could never cowboy up and take some responsibility for their own inept actions).
First, so there is no misunderstanding here, your right to stand your ground is a given. Now, without making light of your right to do so (certainly not my intent, but communication online is void of eye contact and facial expressions, etc., so to be clear the following comments have nothing to do with disagreeing with the position you have taken on who went where and who met with this person or that person).
However, in fairness to the legacy of President John F. Kennedy's position on the ill-advised war in Vietnam given by those knee-jerk, blood thirsty hawks over at the Pentagon, it's a matter of public record (whether through his public speeches, EO's, etc.,) that the president was trying to avoid the slippery-slope those no good warmongers pushed him toward.
In fact, the final straw for those warmongering hawks IMHO was the president's smart move of reversal in Vietnam; but where they could forgive him for their own debacle at the Bay of Pigs; and, his calm, cool and collected handling of the Cuban Missiles crisis, those entrenched hawks embedded deeply within the machinery of the Military Industrial Complex just couldn't allow the young whippersnapper in their little minds show them the right way to engage humanity any further.
President John F. Kennedy was a man of peace, someone who simply wanted to adopt the old sensible doctrine of 'Walk Softly, But Carry A BIG Stick", but those no good for nothing warmongers just had to have their damn war didn't they?! f#$$$$@ clowns.
That said, Mr. Kaiser, I want you to know your right to hold your own position on who went where and who met this person or that person or not isn't my issue here with you. Carry on sir. Enjoy your day. Cheers!
The audacity of those %$#%@ clowns over on E Street and over at the Pentagon (Mr. Kennedy wasn't even at fault for their self made debacle at the BOP, but yet these lying treasonous cowards could never cowboy up and take some responsibility for their own inept actions).