Heads Up!

[Alan Ford]

*by doing so one would honestly have to note the obvious: the gentlemen in the far left corner w/his bare arms exposed is the only individual--male or female--not accounted for in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381.

*Further honesty would require one to note he is "not a stranger" per the sworn statements of all of his fellow employees shared within the aforementioned CE 1381

*Taking honesty even a bit further would require one to refrain from making distortions and distractions about he's a woman clutching a purse, or how tall he is as oppose to someone else standing a considerable distance from him.

*Genuine honesty would require one to honestly see just who is standing there. He is not a female, nor a stranger...

Hey Arlen Spector, Gerald Ford, Allen Dulles, etc. al, you got a second? ("National Security"?! playing the coward card eh?)

Q & A relative to Prayer Man ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq no distortions, no distractions, and no confusing the meaning of the word honestly.

This reply makes no attempt to answer the height argument that refutes Murphy's theory pre-emptively.


There are some obvious ROKC proxies on this site who have been given free reign and are not answering good facts.


Mr Ford: Genuine honesty would answer the height argument and admit there is no perspective shift in Darnell. Everything you write is moot compared to the height argument you are conspicuously evading here.


Is this possibly why Murphy abandoned his theory?

I try to avoid stepping into dog smit every chance I can, Mr. Doyle.

Now, here are a couple of facts for you: Prayer Man is the only male figure unaccounted for in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381; and, in addition, he is "not a stranger".

Moreover, taken into consideration the wrongfully accused's own airtight alibi (which was quickly hidden away from public view/consumption for decades) he places himself "out front", even going so far as to share specifically who he was with/near "out front"...therefore, he wasn't guessing, nor making up where he was or who he was with. He simply was there. The available evidence on record within CE 1381 places the individual he says he was with in the same vicinity of where he would have known he was there.

As difficult as it may be, Mr. Doyle, you may want to put your measuring tape away, and set your focus upon more obvious questions:

Why of all people was this figure not accounted for?
Why does this figure match precisely the wrongfully accused's alibi stating where he was when a barrage of gunfire erupted in Dealey Plaza?
Why was his airtight alibi hidden away from public view/consumption?
Why he cannot be/isn't a stranger? (see CE 1381)
Why (though you will ignore the obvious, but somehow perceive his height) does this figure bear a striking resemblance to a man, who just happens to look like someone you cannot bring yourself to say? John 8:32

Amazing that your eyes can detect height and height differentials from mere photos...

Q & A relative to discussing Prayer Man rather than distortions & distractions may be gleaned here ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq