09-03-2016, 12:54 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-03-2016, 01:27 AM by Albert Doyle.)
A more simple way to understand this is to take a long string and make Darnell's camera lens a firm anchor point. Now imagine you are able to enter the Darnell frame and walk around in it. If you take this long string and hold it taught after reaching the center point of Frazier (let's call the center point a pole that comes up through the center of his body) this is the distance from Darnell's lens to Frazier.
There is a curved arc that swings from left to right from the left edge of Darnell's frame to the right. Technically it would swing in a full 360 degree circle if walked all the way around, but we only have to deal with the segment in Darnell's frame. All points along this segment are all in the same perspective plane because they are all at the same distance from the lens, which in turn means they can be directly compared. I don't see why I'm having to explain this because this is basic science 101.
If we took our string that was stretched exactly to the center point of Frazier and walked it over to Prayer Man we would see that Prayer Man's center pole was no more than 12 inches further back from the lens in distance. What the doubters fail to realize is the photogrammetry science actually works with me and I am offering the better more technical evidence (while being patronized). The very same science these men are referring to involves geometric math that can quite readily determine the scale difference in perspective involving these measurements. You would find that, being generous, a 12 inch depth difference at that distance from Darnell's lens would account for a 1/2 inch perspective shift at the most, and that is probably stretching it. So even with your alleged claims of perspective skewing the numbers are still there to prove Prayer Man isn't Oswald because a 1/2 inch isn't enough to overturn the given height difference. It still refutes Prayer Man being Oswald because Prayer Man is still too short.
I think the doubters don't realize the ridiculousness of their claims and haven't done the true math they seem to be invoking but not doing any credible follow-through on. With the known dimensions of the portal, and Prayer Man being basically even with Frazier on the landing, the straight edge of the landing would take Prayer Man slightly further back from this arc curve. Really it would probably be more like 6 inches. I'm only saying 12 inches because I'm trying to show my numbers are good even when being generous. This is quite calculable because the 5 feet Prayer Man and Frazier are standing apart along with the 20 degree or so tangent off of the arc curve the landing edge represents are all measurable and governed by formulas. These formulas would also determine the maximum perspective differential for objects spaced at those distances. That's the irony of this whole thing because while being talked-down to it is actually me who has the better grasp of the photogrammetry involved. What this science proves is that there's no perspective shift between Frazier and Prayer Man that would disallow any direct height comparison between the two. They are close enough to the same distance plane from Darnell's lens to allow such a direct comparison without any perspective shift. You can plainly see Frazier is 6-7 inches taller than Prayer Man.
Side Note: Can't one of the orders to free all Kennedy evidence be used to sue NBC for release of the Darnell frame for examination? Can the ARRB order be invoked?
.
There is a curved arc that swings from left to right from the left edge of Darnell's frame to the right. Technically it would swing in a full 360 degree circle if walked all the way around, but we only have to deal with the segment in Darnell's frame. All points along this segment are all in the same perspective plane because they are all at the same distance from the lens, which in turn means they can be directly compared. I don't see why I'm having to explain this because this is basic science 101.
If we took our string that was stretched exactly to the center point of Frazier and walked it over to Prayer Man we would see that Prayer Man's center pole was no more than 12 inches further back from the lens in distance. What the doubters fail to realize is the photogrammetry science actually works with me and I am offering the better more technical evidence (while being patronized). The very same science these men are referring to involves geometric math that can quite readily determine the scale difference in perspective involving these measurements. You would find that, being generous, a 12 inch depth difference at that distance from Darnell's lens would account for a 1/2 inch perspective shift at the most, and that is probably stretching it. So even with your alleged claims of perspective skewing the numbers are still there to prove Prayer Man isn't Oswald because a 1/2 inch isn't enough to overturn the given height difference. It still refutes Prayer Man being Oswald because Prayer Man is still too short.
I think the doubters don't realize the ridiculousness of their claims and haven't done the true math they seem to be invoking but not doing any credible follow-through on. With the known dimensions of the portal, and Prayer Man being basically even with Frazier on the landing, the straight edge of the landing would take Prayer Man slightly further back from this arc curve. Really it would probably be more like 6 inches. I'm only saying 12 inches because I'm trying to show my numbers are good even when being generous. This is quite calculable because the 5 feet Prayer Man and Frazier are standing apart along with the 20 degree or so tangent off of the arc curve the landing edge represents are all measurable and governed by formulas. These formulas would also determine the maximum perspective differential for objects spaced at those distances. That's the irony of this whole thing because while being talked-down to it is actually me who has the better grasp of the photogrammetry involved. What this science proves is that there's no perspective shift between Frazier and Prayer Man that would disallow any direct height comparison between the two. They are close enough to the same distance plane from Darnell's lens to allow such a direct comparison without any perspective shift. You can plainly see Frazier is 6-7 inches taller than Prayer Man.
Side Note: Can't one of the orders to free all Kennedy evidence be used to sue NBC for release of the Darnell frame for examination? Can the ARRB order be invoked?
.