09-03-2016, 01:41 AM
oy friggin vey ::headbang::
What was the focal length of the lens being used?
http://expertphotography.com/understand-...asy-steps/
These cans are the same size
Depending on the Focal Length of the lens (and the distance to the subject since the higher focal length, the farther away the camera has to be from the subject to retain the same framing).. we can make the can in front seem almost twice as tall, while a zoomed lens does the opposite.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8169&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8169&stc=1)
How far away from each other are the cans based on the 300mm image?
Different than the 24mm? of course.
That BS you are peddling about arcs on a circle and some relationship between these distances is very amusing Albert. It confirms you not only haven't the first clue related to photography but you'll make up anything you think will aid in your selling such tripe.
Unmitigated bullsh!t buddy. Fetzer and Cinque could use a man like you!
PM is only 12 inches (maybe even 6) further back that the Wesley? - didn't your fingers get all stinky pulling that out of your a$$?
You don't have the first clue about the distances that separated them just as you would tell me the can in the back is at varying distances from the front car - depending on which photo I showed you.
If I took the focal lengths off this image you'd be telling me the cans moved - brilliant!
It's okay to be wrong Albert. Okay to admit you are making a mistake and simply don't understand measurements and distance of a 3d representation on 2d space.
or you can keep on guessing and throwing things against the wall to see what sticks.
One gives you a slight bit of class and self respect - the other just keeps your hands and fingers stinky...
:
:
::evilpenguin::
What was the focal length of the lens being used?
http://expertphotography.com/understand-...asy-steps/
These cans are the same size
Depending on the Focal Length of the lens (and the distance to the subject since the higher focal length, the farther away the camera has to be from the subject to retain the same framing).. we can make the can in front seem almost twice as tall, while a zoomed lens does the opposite.
How far away from each other are the cans based on the 300mm image?
Different than the 24mm? of course.
That BS you are peddling about arcs on a circle and some relationship between these distances is very amusing Albert. It confirms you not only haven't the first clue related to photography but you'll make up anything you think will aid in your selling such tripe.
Quote:If we took our string that was stretched exactly to the center point of Frazier and walked it over to Prayer Man we would see that Prayer Man's center pole was no more than 12 inches further back from the lens in distance
...
You would find that, being generous, a 12 inch depth difference at that distance from Darnell's lens would account for a 1/2 inch perspective shift at the most, and that is probably stretching it
Unmitigated bullsh!t buddy. Fetzer and Cinque could use a man like you!
PM is only 12 inches (maybe even 6) further back that the Wesley? - didn't your fingers get all stinky pulling that out of your a$$?
You don't have the first clue about the distances that separated them just as you would tell me the can in the back is at varying distances from the front car - depending on which photo I showed you.
If I took the focal lengths off this image you'd be telling me the cans moved - brilliant!
It's okay to be wrong Albert. Okay to admit you are making a mistake and simply don't understand measurements and distance of a 3d representation on 2d space.
or you can keep on guessing and throwing things against the wall to see what sticks.
One gives you a slight bit of class and self respect - the other just keeps your hands and fingers stinky...
:
:::evilpenguin::
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter