10-03-2016, 06:42 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Alan Ford Wrote:So there's no confusion here, Mr. Phipps, I don't place Prayer Man "behind" (I actually place his position forward of Mr. Frazier, given his right elbow placement on the pillar considerably forward of Mr. Frazier's position further back).
<----note the wrongfully accused's right elbow on the pillar...
Now, note the distance the pillar sits forward of the 3 feet landing space where Mr. Frazier stood towering above...
Mr. Darnell's image captures Prayer Man's right elbow upon the pillar. Also, it's not frivolous to believe Prayer Man is also leaning back upon the pillar as well for support. People who lean like that also lose inches to their full height as well.
Sorry Alan but you can't ignore the Fratini evidence I posted that makes it more than clear that Prayer Man is standing on the landing.
The reason you can't place Prayer Man too far forward from Frazier is because of the very limitations of the portal landing that you yourself cite. The front edge would keep that from occurring and not allow Prayer Man to be far enough forward to affect my arguments. It is impossible for Prayer Man to be "considerably forward" of Frazier because the first step down creates a border that limits that distance to a negligible length. Prayer Man is roughly even with Frazier where both individuals went as far forward in the portal on the landing as they could without stepping down. This conforms to human behavior. This is the correct orientation of Prayer Man and Frazier according to all known evidence. With that established, science demands that any serious analyzer answer to the obvious height difference this incurs. Mr Josephs must heed to this because it is firm and accurate science as shown right here in front of you.
Prayer Man is not leaning. He is facing Frazier with both hands grasping something as even Kamp foolishly admitted without realizing the consequences. Kamp announced a departure from the internet immediately after I exposed him doing that but never followed-through. Mr Parker said Prayer Man's left elbow was reflected in the glass. When I pointed out to him that there was no such reflection in other frames he had no answer.
Mr Ford: It is entirely foolish for you to not realize you have just confirmed my direct height comparison argument and disproven Prayer Man as Oswald by your own entry.
I was quite serious when I said this was proof.
First, it's merely your opinion that Prayer Man is not leaning. We get that you created in your own mind that you have magical measuring prowess void of actually being on the scene of the intended objects to be measured; however, suffice it to say we have to draw the line somewhere sir and reel you in. Fasten your seat belt please.
In respect to Mr. Frantini, Mr. Parker and Mr. Kamp, where are you going to find people with more due diligence? People who genuinely care about advancing this issue in a way indicative of the justice JFK deserves.
Now, having said that, Mr. Doyle, rely less upon your own opinions, and accept the considerable distance between (not what I'm saying) but what the photographic evidence clearly shows in Mr. Darnell's image where the wrongfully accused's right elbow rests upon the pillar...a pillar mind you that in the image looking outward of the TSBD rests beyond the 3 foot landing, where Mr. Frazier is seen towering over everyone else in Mr. Darnell's photo.
I await evidence of your medical degree that allows you to determine where and when someone is leaning or not. Go ahead, make my day.
Meanwhile, please note Prayer Man's right elbow...
and, once again, see how forward of Mr. Frazier's position the pillar, where his right elbow rests, is by being honest instead of relying upon your opinion.

