10-03-2016, 08:59 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2016, 09:18 PM by Albert Doyle.)
Alan Ford Wrote:First, it's merely your opinion that Prayer Man is not leaning. We get that you created in your own mind that you have magical measuring prowess void of actually being on the scene of the intended objects to be measured; however, suffice it to say we have to draw the line somewhere sir and reel you in. Fasten your seat belt please.
Wrong. If you obey the forensic evidence I've been posting Darnell is at about a 20 degree angle to the portal. The fact Prayer Man's head is aligned with the aluminum frame, combined with your far forward claim, necessitates that Prayer Man be pulled away from the wall by geometric science. With the locations you yourself have admitted, that 20 degree triangulation mathematically requires a space between Prayer Man's shoulder and the wall. This is not "opinion" it is science that must be answered to. A far forward position creates a scalene triangle when you input the tangents from a far forward position of Prayer Man to the frame; the front landing edge; and the west wall. These necessary lengths are created by the necessary dimensions of your claim when credibly connected to the necessary science. A simple observation of this incurred measure would show Prayer Man would have to be pulled far from the wall by the front landing edge side of this triangle (And to think I am the one being accused of "not bringing enough to the table"). You can't escape the science Alan. That's why they do forensics.
Your side is on borrowed time because if the Darnell original is ever analyzed it will prove what I'm saying. That analysis will show Prayer Man's face and open breast are facing Frazier along with the buttons. His arms are also open, grasping something with both hands (as Kamp admitted), and oriented towards Frazier. This is further evidenced below.
Alan Ford Wrote:In respect to Mr. Frantini, Mr. Parker and Mr. Kamp, where are you going to find people with more due diligence? People who genuinely care about advancing this issue in a way indicative of the justice JFK deserves.
Surely you are joking? Those men have ignored all of my arguments. Parker never answered for his one step down claim being refuted by Fratini and Kamp never answered to his admitting Prayer Man was manipulating something with both hands. Hardly what I would call "due diligence". More like running from the proof.
Alan Ford Wrote:Now, having said that, Mr. Doyle, rely less upon your own opinions, and accept the considerable distance between (not what I'm saying) but what the photographic evidence clearly shows in Mr. Darnell's image where the wrongfully accused's right elbow rests upon the pillar...a pillar mind you that in the image looking outward of the TSBD rests beyond the 3 foot landing, where Mr. Frazier is seen towering over everyone else in Mr. Darnell's photo.
I'm afraid you don't realize your own comments prove what I'm saying. For Prayer Man's shoulder to be leaning against the faux brickwork pillar would require him to be on the first step down. If you look at your own photos you will see the faux pillar is next to the first step down and not the landing. You must obey Fratini's evidence that Prayer Man is on the landing. It is correct, provable, and valid. Once you allow that Prayer Man is on the landing it is not anatomically possible that his elbow could be touching the faux pillar since your own photos show the pillar is at least a foot forward and a step down from the landing edge. If you look very carefully Prayer Man's elbow is further out than his shoulder. That isn't possible if he was leaning against the wall with his shoulder. And for Parker's crossed arms claim to be correct Prayer Man would have to have his arms cocked up to the left at an unnaturally uncomfortable angle.
You don't seem to grasp that Fratini's evidence (that you cite as due diligence) precludes Prayer Man's elbow from being in contact with the faux pillar by science. The only way Prayer Man's elbow could be in direct contact with the faux pillar would be if he was on the first step down. Mr Fratini's evidence disproves that. You are failing to answer for it or realize the fatal conflicts in what you write. Just look at your own pictures.
Alan Ford Wrote:I await evidence of your medical degree that allows you to determine where and when someone is leaning or not. Go ahead, make my day.
Meanwhile, please note Prayer Man's right elbow...
and, once again, see how forward of Mr. Frazier's position the pillar, where his right elbow rests, is by being honest instead of relying upon your opinion.
Sorry Alan but your posts show a serious lack of grasp of the scientific terms of the portal, its dimensions, and forensics.
With Fratini proving Prayer Man is on the landing, literally, the only way Prayer Man's elbow could appear to be in contact with the faux pillar brickwork would be if his arm and elbow were swung outward by facing Frazier. I thank you for pointing this out to me because it is yet another internal forensic indicator that is impervious to any claims of focal point skewing - that Mr Josephs has yet to credibly respond to.
I'm sorry but my points are directly connected to firm geometric triangulation science and specific forensic landmarks that the opposition appears to have no grasp of or how they prove what I'm saying.
.

