10-03-2016, 09:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-03-2016, 10:04 PM by Albert Doyle.)
David Josephs Wrote:A decent guess but off by 25%.
Your last post flagrantly skipped my last reply to you on your challenge of my height claim.
David - You might want to pay closer attention to your illustration. It starts inside the foyer behind the glass and extends to the first step. In other words it is not a measure of the landing width. It shows that my 4 foot guess is about exactly right. The '5 feet' indicated in your illustration corresponds to the scale shown to its left and is not a measurement of the landing. But let me know if you have any more condescending corrections...
Quote:Albert - Place the man wherever you want - doesn't change the simple facts about the photo or how wrong you are about dimensions and perspective.
I'm afraid Mr Josephs that you've forfeited your credibility. For you to say what you write here and not realize how it exposes your ignorance of what is being argued is bad.
Your statement here is simply answered by the fact that once you concede Prayer Man is at the same distance plane as Frazier that you have no excuse for not honoring the height comparison by science. You are foolish to not realize that even your specious focal point claim does not serve as adequate excuse for not honoring this basic, undeniable simple science.
It is not me who is placing Prayer Man forward and even with Frazier it is my forensic evidence that you have uncredibly not given credit to. If you did correctly credit that evidence it would show, as my arguments claimed, that Prayer Man is at a distance where he is directly comparable to Frazier and therefore the obvious 6-7 inch height difference can be validly cited. Since this height difference scientifically proves that Prayer Man cannot be Oswald it can rightly be claimed that this issue is solved once and for all and that Murphy's theory has been debunked.
.

