11-03-2016, 06:07 PM
Morning gentlemen,
A decent idea. Mr. Phipps. I'm all for any fairly rendered application of measurement. This matter shouldn't become mired down into who is right and who is wrong. After all, An innocent, unarmed representative of the People was killed. Exacting a sense of justice for him should be our top priority.
That said, without creating a measurement-commission of sorts, I do think if such measurement confirmation study was actually undertaken that it should be conducted by neutral parties to enhance an unbiased outcome. How we do that poses a real challenge. If I was a casual observer, without any vested interest in an outcome at stake, I would suggest the selection of a seven member panel of non-vested parties, whose compositional make up reflects 3 CT's, 3 LN's and an independent party of impeccable integrity. However, given this very contentious issue, it may be much easier to get the notorious Hell Angels and another biker group together to sing Kumbaya.
Whether that format is possible or even something the research community wishes to pursue is not my call. However, at the very least, a fair minded approach is the best manner to determine measurements (no opinions, just a fair application of all of the available evidence). Set a venue, convene an honest panel, record the proceedings and let the evidence or lack thereof speak for itself (add some women please, we've already smucked up bad enough with all men the last time).
That said, enjoy your day everyone. Cheers!
An objective, evidenced based Q & A relative to Prayer Man ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq no distortions, no distractions.
*Still working on a photo image that deserves my full attention before making an accompanying post in the near future. I never noticed that crook in the step before.
A decent idea. Mr. Phipps. I'm all for any fairly rendered application of measurement. This matter shouldn't become mired down into who is right and who is wrong. After all, An innocent, unarmed representative of the People was killed. Exacting a sense of justice for him should be our top priority.
That said, without creating a measurement-commission of sorts, I do think if such measurement confirmation study was actually undertaken that it should be conducted by neutral parties to enhance an unbiased outcome. How we do that poses a real challenge. If I was a casual observer, without any vested interest in an outcome at stake, I would suggest the selection of a seven member panel of non-vested parties, whose compositional make up reflects 3 CT's, 3 LN's and an independent party of impeccable integrity. However, given this very contentious issue, it may be much easier to get the notorious Hell Angels and another biker group together to sing Kumbaya.
Whether that format is possible or even something the research community wishes to pursue is not my call. However, at the very least, a fair minded approach is the best manner to determine measurements (no opinions, just a fair application of all of the available evidence). Set a venue, convene an honest panel, record the proceedings and let the evidence or lack thereof speak for itself (add some women please, we've already smucked up bad enough with all men the last time).
That said, enjoy your day everyone. Cheers!
An objective, evidenced based Q & A relative to Prayer Man ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq no distortions, no distractions.
*Still working on a photo image that deserves my full attention before making an accompanying post in the near future. I never noticed that crook in the step before.