11-03-2016, 07:46 PM
On this past January 7, you wrote on this forum:
Mr. Hargrove,
You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately associated it with John Armstrong.
Please take down your link to your web page displaying my unattributed original research details here and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of my original research, and images I am the original presenter of, from your web pages.
I "deliberately associated" the article with John Armstrong because he wrote it, and you are clearly making a charge of plagiarism against him. At the time you made the accusation, John Armstrong had just left for a month long trip to China, and I was leaving the next morning to spend a week on the East Coast with my brother and his family. I've always thought it was unwise to announce on the Internet that one's home would be empty for some time, and so rather than try to hash this out from the road, I simply announced I would take the article down until Mr. Armstrong could respond to your accusations.
When I returned, however, I had time to follow some of the links you presented allegedly showing the plagiarism you had declared. I saw no such thing, although I did see plenty of words written by John Armstrong that you did not ask permission to post. And so I asked you again and again and again, ten times in fact, in the same thread you made the original accusation, to paste from one of your dated posts here the words you claim Mr. Armstrong stole from you. You never did so, and after my numerous warnings, I put the article back up.
Now I see you are making similar, defamatory statements about Mr. Armstrong's work in a thread started by Alan Ford entitled "Heads Up!" By doing so, you completely veered the topic away from the misdeeds of a virulent Warren Commission Apologist on EF, and, as always, you completely obfuscated evidence for your original charge in your usual cloud of dust and non-specific data dumps. Do you do ANYTHING here other than try to criticize John Armstrong?
This is REAL SIMPLE! Copy the words from one of your dated posts prior to January 7 that you feel John Armstrong stole from you, and paste them in this thread. Show us how he took "excerpts almost word for word" of your research in his article. SHOW US THE ACTUAL WORDS! Don't show us a cloud of dust!
Your charges are clearly defamatory. For the eleventh time, put up or shut up!
Mr. Hargrove,
You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately associated it with John Armstrong.
Please take down your link to your web page displaying my unattributed original research details here and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of my original research, and images I am the original presenter of, from your web pages.
I "deliberately associated" the article with John Armstrong because he wrote it, and you are clearly making a charge of plagiarism against him. At the time you made the accusation, John Armstrong had just left for a month long trip to China, and I was leaving the next morning to spend a week on the East Coast with my brother and his family. I've always thought it was unwise to announce on the Internet that one's home would be empty for some time, and so rather than try to hash this out from the road, I simply announced I would take the article down until Mr. Armstrong could respond to your accusations.
When I returned, however, I had time to follow some of the links you presented allegedly showing the plagiarism you had declared. I saw no such thing, although I did see plenty of words written by John Armstrong that you did not ask permission to post. And so I asked you again and again and again, ten times in fact, in the same thread you made the original accusation, to paste from one of your dated posts here the words you claim Mr. Armstrong stole from you. You never did so, and after my numerous warnings, I put the article back up.
Now I see you are making similar, defamatory statements about Mr. Armstrong's work in a thread started by Alan Ford entitled "Heads Up!" By doing so, you completely veered the topic away from the misdeeds of a virulent Warren Commission Apologist on EF, and, as always, you completely obfuscated evidence for your original charge in your usual cloud of dust and non-specific data dumps. Do you do ANYTHING here other than try to criticize John Armstrong?
This is REAL SIMPLE! Copy the words from one of your dated posts prior to January 7 that you feel John Armstrong stole from you, and paste them in this thread. Show us how he took "excerpts almost word for word" of your research in his article. SHOW US THE ACTUAL WORDS! Don't show us a cloud of dust!
Your charges are clearly defamatory. For the eleventh time, put up or shut up!
HarveyandLee.net
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996
Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.†– 1996