11-03-2016, 08:24 PM
David Josephs Wrote:I prefer to ignore you from now on Albert...
You continue to illustrate how NOT to approach science or fact.
Since there's nothing wrong with my science or arguments, and you couldn't directly show how they were wrong, I'll assume you are defaulting and simply can't answer them. I find that somewhat intellectually dishonest. You keep referring to my arguments being flawed because they fail your standards but then ignore how they do meet an adequate standard that proves Prayer Man can't be Oswald. You are simply referencing your excuse and ignoring that which refutes it. Also, your alleged standard isn't as sound as you would like to think and you refuse to discuss that too. Your overly-general focal length photo science doesn't overcome my internal forensic landmarks you flagrantly ignored. Fair enough. The public can see what you're doing.
I just realized that the faux brickwork pillar may have been misreferenced by Mr Ford and I allowed it. On second look I'm not sure if Prayer Man's elbow is overlapping that faux pillar? In Darnell it looks like there is a healthy space between Prayer Man's elbow and that brickwork. This is important to determine because it orients Prayer Man according to the specific forensics.
Where David is cutting and running is right where we were getting to the part where we determined the camera lens used by the WBAP film crew. I imagine it was a common lens used by TV news crews at the time and could probably be found out pretty easily. We could then determine the focal point. But I'm forced to say the arguments and evidence I presented that David ignored showed why we don't need to know that.
Discussion of Wesley's location in other photos is a switch of the subject and irrelevant.
Nice hand-wave vs solid arguments Dave. And you have the nerve to say I'm​ not bringing enough to the table. What I brought to the table clearly made you run and your feet speak louder than your words.

