Heads Up!

[Albert Doyle]

and yet the world remains flat because of Mr. Doyle's near-sighted sense of "science".

You and Mr. Josephs, Mr. Cross, have the patience of Saints. A fair, objective analysis allows for all key elements--including the dynamics of photography--to be included before arriving at a definitive conclusion.

There's an obvious 45 degree angle differential between Prayer Man and Mr. Frazier (there is an obvious reason for that, Prayer Man is standing well forward of Mr. Frazier's position). Thus, they are not on the same measuring plane.

Your side has been given the opportunity to answer the easily explained science presented by both Drew and myself. It passed and therefore defaulted Alan.

You are ignoring sound arguments on why Prayer Man can't be well forward of Frazier at a 45 degree angle. Fratini's evidence proves beyond a doubt that Prayer Man is standing on the landing. You, David, and Michael are ignoring it and therefore forfeiting your credibility. You can't ignore sound evidence and still claim credibility. Fratini's evidence shows beyond a doubt that a man who was confirmed as standing at the landing level had identical body proportions to Prayer Man. The two film clips shown by MacRae and Unger both clearly show Prayer Man on the landing. And, finally, if you had any sense of the forensics you would realize for Prayer Man to be 45 degrees forward of Frazier would put him in the sun.

Your men David and Michael are ignoring this because they are well aware if they discuss it it will refute their previous position.

You shouldn't be allowed to do flagrant ROKC proxying (trolling really) on this forum while so flagrantly ignoring good arguments.

If you tried to show why Fratini's evidence is wrong you wouldn't be able to and cheerleading is no replacement.

Your level of discussion, Alan, is conspicuously below the level Drew and I are presenting and fails to answer it in a self-dismissing way.