13-03-2016, 01:29 AM
Alan Ford Wrote:On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, I'm not ignoring your "points" as much as trying to share all of the available facts. Any honest rendering of Prayer Man's position has to take into account the same dynamics exhibited by Mr. Cook (Don). To avoid this is to avoid the truth.
You say while ignoring how your 45 degree forward argument only works in my favor and you didn't realize it. Alan, you've ignored just about every single major point of evidence I've shown. You ignored Drew's math too.
Fratini's evidence proves Prayer Man is on the landing. You totally ignored it.
Alan Ford Wrote:Now, once again, Mr. Doyle, Looking at this next photo image honestly ----->
*Credit Prayer-Man website
Do you really think the lady donned in black (4th step up) just ahead of the lady in white (3 steps up), with her head at the mid-section of Mr. Oswald is 7'4" tall?????, enabling her to reach his mid-section as IF he's way up there in the back shadows w/Mr. Frazier??????
The reason why her head reaches his mid-section there is because he is close to her, not far away standing up in the shadows with Mr. Frazier.
What kind of nutty crap is this?
What the hell are you talking about? Where do you get 7 foot 4 and how does it have anything to do with my arguments?
Alan: For the 100th time - Both Unger and MacRae posted film clips that show Prayer Man is on the landing. My forensic locators that you and David ignored also prove it. Finally, the Fratini evidence you have yet to acknowledge proves it beyond a doubt. There is no other evidence (as your nutty entry here shows).
If you were smart you would realize the fact you can assign steps to people's locations proves there is no perspective distortion in Darnell. A credible analyzer would then use those perspective observations to realize Prayer Man is visibly much further back than the 4th step lady and therefore can be visually determined to not be on the first step down.
It is right there in front of you in your own photo. You're not too smart Alan. If you look at any photo of the front steps the first step down is the 6th step. Since you can clearly see the 4th step, as you yourself say here, you have no excuse for not seeing or admitting that Prayer Man is obviously too far back from the 4th step to be on the 6th step.
Your entry is incompetent by the way. Because donned in black lady's relationship to Prayer Man is dependent on camera height and not the nutty claim you make.
You're just being silly at this point.
Do you realize Mr Ford that while complimenting David Josephs and crediting him with disproving me that you just proved his claim wrong by being able to determine different objects at different distances in Darnell - and therefore proving my point? David said that no measurement of distance between objects was possible, but as you show here that simply isn't true. Mr Cross never responded when I pointed this out.