13-03-2016, 05:42 PM
You're just re-entering rubbish again Alan and trying to hijack the credible conversation into your garbage bozo analysis.
If you look at white head lady she is one step above donned in black lady. It is plainly visible that she is not close enough to Prayer Man for Prayer Man to be on the first step down.
Since you refuse to answer plain reality and refuse to recognize the film clips that show Prayer Man clearly standing on the landing, as well as Fratini's proof that Prayer Man is on the landing, I cannot respond to any more of your posts since you are not a rational poster. This site used to have a higher level of rigor and did not allow such brazen trolling of seriously-presented fact. A serious researcher would see the references to the clips and Fratini and seek out if they had merit. Unserious posters would ignore them and enter garbage pseudo-analysis in order to confound the issue.
Drew backed-up what I had written about the true photogrammetry (the kind that requires a response instead of being ignored). A credible poster on this subject would realize that the maximum perspective differential, according to the trigonometry Drew spelled-out, would be .38 inches and not be enough to offset the clear 6-7 inch height difference seen in Darnell. Drew's math was ignored. As were my forensic locators that overcome David's vastly over-general (yet moderator-approved) photo science. Again, a more objective researcher would seek out Darnell's lens and reason how it applies instead of ignoring. It's pretty clear some egos just don't want to be wrong. They're hiding behind false reasoning in order to ignore what they know they can't answer. This is what the Warren Commission did.
There's a serious double standard and lack of credibility on this issue. Also an obvious ROKC proxy is being allowed to troll serious input.
If you look at white head lady she is one step above donned in black lady. It is plainly visible that she is not close enough to Prayer Man for Prayer Man to be on the first step down.
Since you refuse to answer plain reality and refuse to recognize the film clips that show Prayer Man clearly standing on the landing, as well as Fratini's proof that Prayer Man is on the landing, I cannot respond to any more of your posts since you are not a rational poster. This site used to have a higher level of rigor and did not allow such brazen trolling of seriously-presented fact. A serious researcher would see the references to the clips and Fratini and seek out if they had merit. Unserious posters would ignore them and enter garbage pseudo-analysis in order to confound the issue.
Drew backed-up what I had written about the true photogrammetry (the kind that requires a response instead of being ignored). A credible poster on this subject would realize that the maximum perspective differential, according to the trigonometry Drew spelled-out, would be .38 inches and not be enough to offset the clear 6-7 inch height difference seen in Darnell. Drew's math was ignored. As were my forensic locators that overcome David's vastly over-general (yet moderator-approved) photo science. Again, a more objective researcher would seek out Darnell's lens and reason how it applies instead of ignoring. It's pretty clear some egos just don't want to be wrong. They're hiding behind false reasoning in order to ignore what they know they can't answer. This is what the Warren Commission did.
There's a serious double standard and lack of credibility on this issue. Also an obvious ROKC proxy is being allowed to troll serious input.