13-03-2016, 07:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 13-03-2016, 08:17 PM by Albert Doyle.)
It is ignorant to not realize that even if Prayer Man were hypothetically on the first step down that the arc curve of the distance plane from Darnell's lens would transit close enough to him that he would still be technically even with Frazier. Instead of being slightly behind Frazier, if Prayer Man was on the first step down he would be around 6 inches forward of Frazier in relation to the distance plane. As Drew's trigonometry proved, a 5 foot depth separation would only create a .38 inch difference in height between Prayer Man and Frazier. At 6 inches it would only be .038 inches. This is such a minute difference that it would only create a negligible perspective differential and therefore have no affect on the obvious 6-7 inch height difference clearly seen in Darnell.
David Josephs is getting away with analysis murder here because his radical perspective shift claim between different lenses does not answer this better science. David's argument is basically that because such radical shifts can occur between different lenses that therefore they did occur. But that isn't how rational analysis logic works. We have shown that there are serious mitigating factors such as the obvious perspective quality seen by the naked eye in Darnell; as well as the predictable lens and lens setting of Darnell's news camera; not to mention other serious mitigating portal forensic science that further narrows down the features seen in Darnell. These factors all serve to eliminate most of the extreme possibilities David is alluding to, but not owning up to when it comes to validating them via these provable particulars.
If Prayer Man were hypothetically on the first step down, and technically even with Frazier, the height science would still disprove him being Oswald. The first step down is 7 inches. When you calculate the 6-7 inch height difference between Frazier and Prayer Man, and add that 7 inches for the step, it means Prayer Man would also be the same height as Frazier. Since Frazier is 6 foot tall that therefore also excludes Prayer Man as being Oswald by firm science.
Darnell and camera:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site...0NWctfM%3A
https://jfkassassinationfiles.files.word...n-left.jpg
.
David Josephs is getting away with analysis murder here because his radical perspective shift claim between different lenses does not answer this better science. David's argument is basically that because such radical shifts can occur between different lenses that therefore they did occur. But that isn't how rational analysis logic works. We have shown that there are serious mitigating factors such as the obvious perspective quality seen by the naked eye in Darnell; as well as the predictable lens and lens setting of Darnell's news camera; not to mention other serious mitigating portal forensic science that further narrows down the features seen in Darnell. These factors all serve to eliminate most of the extreme possibilities David is alluding to, but not owning up to when it comes to validating them via these provable particulars.
If Prayer Man were hypothetically on the first step down, and technically even with Frazier, the height science would still disprove him being Oswald. The first step down is 7 inches. When you calculate the 6-7 inch height difference between Frazier and Prayer Man, and add that 7 inches for the step, it means Prayer Man would also be the same height as Frazier. Since Frazier is 6 foot tall that therefore also excludes Prayer Man as being Oswald by firm science.
Darnell and camera:
https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site...0NWctfM%3A
https://jfkassassinationfiles.files.word...n-left.jpg
.