Heads Up!

[Albert Doyle]

I don't flee. I tire of your boorish bullshit.

There's a remarkable coincidence between your tiring and not answering that which refutes you. This level of conversation is not what I would expect on the Deep Politics board. You have managed to lower the quality of discussion on this board to the ROKC level.

ROKC proxy, I'm a member there...

Which is more than clear from your posting. ROKC is a notorious troll site. This site used to screen ROKC proxies. Especially when they got to the point of the flagrant evidence evasion you are currently practicing.

You have nothing, and your attempt to discredit me or David by trying to associate me/us with another forum is an indication of the lack of depth of your position.

You do an awful lot of running from nothing.

If the "readers" think I'm insulting their intelligence by calling you on the bullshit you purvey, they are welcome to chime in. All I see in this thread Albert is a moderator that agreed with David, Jim D doing the same, Alan agreeing with us and another member astutely pointing out that there are no people in the Darnell image - there are shades of gray in arrangements that represent people in two dimensions. I don't see a rush of Brian/Albert supporters queueing up to tout the relevancy of the crap you purvey.

You're not answering the arguments I'm making. Instead you're making excuses and entering this kind of crap. My posts contain good content and serious arguments of evidence. Your posts contain the above.

You ignored Drew's math. You aren't credible. You can't ignore good science no matter what your excuse.


The fact you say there are no people seen in Darnell is demented and shows a lack of credible scrutiny of posts on the site's behalf.

Your "geometry" is by DEFINITION based on assumptions of placement and size. You don't have a laser grid of the space, you don't have actual positions of the people that were there, you have assumptions and estimations.

That isn't true and when Drew spelled-out his precise math you ignored it. You're a fool Mr Cross. The dimensions referred to by Drew are firm and never change since they are the measured and known dimensions of the portal. You're obviously desperate for excuses while ignoring the provable math. We do have a confirmed spatial map as established by Roberdeaux. You're just entering silly defiance Mr Cross that I would expect from children and not a member of the Deep Politics board.

Contrary to your falsehood above, Drew has established the correct trigonometry involved. He has correctly referenced Roberdeaux's 90 foot distance for Darnell from the portal as well as the correct perspective varation at such a distance. I noticed that you were totally unable to answer Mr Phipp's sound science. You are offering juvenile stupidity above Mr Cross in reaction to some very intelligently rendered and accurate analysis. I must say you do represent your ROKC site well in that regard.

As for my geometry, as I have already stated, the distance from the aluminum frame aligned with Prayer Man's head at the back wall of the landing to Prayer Man, if he was on the first step down, would be about 4.7 feet. Contrary to your falsehood above, the landing's measurements are well-known and are not estimations as you so incorrectly claimed above. With a 4 foot width for the landing plus an extra 6 inches for Prayer's Man's claimed position on the first step down, that diagonal would be close enough to 4.7 feet. The distance of the side on the west wall would be approximately 4.5 feet. It is simple math that the remaining side along the first step down would be too long to allow any leaning against the wall claim. Simple math that you've not managed any credible answer to.


Greg Parker was sequestered from this site for much less than this.



.