16-03-2016, 04:29 AM
Hear!, hear! Talk about a level playing field! Fair is fair. So indicative of an authority w/integrity :
:
That said...
Sidebar: @Mr. Josephs, your sensible comments are spot on ----->
I truly do not believe we understand the power over the common citizen the DPD, Sheriff and FBI had in the early 60's.
If Wesley truly believed Ozzie was FRAMED... do you honestly believe that same fate could not await him - even if just in his mind?
May also be why the wording was so very careful and nothing deeper was asked, "Did you see Oswald 'at the time of the shooting'"
Since everyone was looking down Elm - or at least most everyone - the answer to THAT question was "no" in every case.
There are more than a few examples in this case where the authorities intimidated witnesses or outright lied themselves. Some even actively participated in the "F" word Mr. Frazier mentions, frame, as in framing an innocent man who committed no wrong, but simply fell victim to an evil plot hatched by sinister snakes at many levels of the "investigation" ...
Here, courtesy of the remarkable Bill Simpich via MFOrg (drawn from his masterful piece State Secrets) is the word frame in action ---->
One final suspicious event revolves around Wesley Buell Frazier, the only Oswald acquaintance who was arrested in Dallas on November 22, and how chief polygraph examiner Paul Bentley claimed to know nothing about him. Bentley was the man at the Texas Theatre arrest scene who lied about taking Oswald's wallet from his back pocket. Frazier sometimes gave Oswald a ride to or from work, and drove him to work that morning. Frazier was the only man to claim that Oswald had carried "curtain rods" in a bag to the Texas School Book Depository. Frazier owned a British Enfield 303, a rifle mysteriously identified by NBC as the murder weapon on November 22 before the story settled around the Mannlicher-Carcano. At about 6:45 pm, Frazier was arrested and picked up for questioning by the Dallas police.
Was Frazier being set up as a possible patsy? One pristine Enfield 303 bullet on a stretcher would have done the job.
Frazier was taken into custody right after Oswald had vehemently denied Frazier's curtain rod story during interrogation. Oswald said the only package he carried to work was his bag lunch, containing cheese, bread, fruit and apples. An FBI report shows that Frazier was given a polygraph at about midnight by R.D. Lewis, the other examiner for the police department, and was then released. We do know that Frazier stated that he did not think that the paper bag found by the police was what Oswald used to carry his curtain rods. As Frazier and his sister were the only ones who ever saw Oswald carrying any kind of brown paper package, and as Frazier by far had the best look, the handmade paper bag "found" at the book depository could not be used as evidence.
Several members of the Dallas police methodically lied about knowing about the "phantom polygraph" even though it was a matter of public record.
A voice stress analysis conducted by George O'Toole, a former chief of the CIA's Problems Analysis Branch, showed chief polygraph examiner Paul Bentley lying about not knowing that Frazier was polygraphed. Even if you don't accept voice stress analysis, it's impossible to believe that Bentley would forget such a significant incident. Why would Bentley lie about this polygraph, even when someone else actually conducted it? The man who conducted the polygraph, R. D. Lewis, claimed he couldn't remember it either. As stated in the FBI report, "the Dallas Police Department (was) of the opinion the brown, heavy paper was used by Oswald to carry the rifle into the building where he was working." The results of Frazier's polygraph killed that theory. Bentley wanted to see Oswald go down.[ 52 ] As mentioned in Chapter 6, even FBI agent Barrett has now labeled Bentley as a liar.
The problem with this case isn't a CT (critical-thinkers) problem. The problem all along is the BIG lie.
Somewhere in all of this, Buell Wesley Frazier should dig deep down within and do some serious soul searching and come clean. No more lies...
:That said...
Sidebar: @Mr. Josephs, your sensible comments are spot on ----->
I truly do not believe we understand the power over the common citizen the DPD, Sheriff and FBI had in the early 60's.
If Wesley truly believed Ozzie was FRAMED... do you honestly believe that same fate could not await him - even if just in his mind?
May also be why the wording was so very careful and nothing deeper was asked, "Did you see Oswald 'at the time of the shooting'"
Since everyone was looking down Elm - or at least most everyone - the answer to THAT question was "no" in every case.
There are more than a few examples in this case where the authorities intimidated witnesses or outright lied themselves. Some even actively participated in the "F" word Mr. Frazier mentions, frame, as in framing an innocent man who committed no wrong, but simply fell victim to an evil plot hatched by sinister snakes at many levels of the "investigation" ...
Here, courtesy of the remarkable Bill Simpich via MFOrg (drawn from his masterful piece State Secrets) is the word frame in action ---->
One final suspicious event revolves around Wesley Buell Frazier, the only Oswald acquaintance who was arrested in Dallas on November 22, and how chief polygraph examiner Paul Bentley claimed to know nothing about him. Bentley was the man at the Texas Theatre arrest scene who lied about taking Oswald's wallet from his back pocket. Frazier sometimes gave Oswald a ride to or from work, and drove him to work that morning. Frazier was the only man to claim that Oswald had carried "curtain rods" in a bag to the Texas School Book Depository. Frazier owned a British Enfield 303, a rifle mysteriously identified by NBC as the murder weapon on November 22 before the story settled around the Mannlicher-Carcano. At about 6:45 pm, Frazier was arrested and picked up for questioning by the Dallas police.
Was Frazier being set up as a possible patsy? One pristine Enfield 303 bullet on a stretcher would have done the job.
Frazier was taken into custody right after Oswald had vehemently denied Frazier's curtain rod story during interrogation. Oswald said the only package he carried to work was his bag lunch, containing cheese, bread, fruit and apples. An FBI report shows that Frazier was given a polygraph at about midnight by R.D. Lewis, the other examiner for the police department, and was then released. We do know that Frazier stated that he did not think that the paper bag found by the police was what Oswald used to carry his curtain rods. As Frazier and his sister were the only ones who ever saw Oswald carrying any kind of brown paper package, and as Frazier by far had the best look, the handmade paper bag "found" at the book depository could not be used as evidence.
Several members of the Dallas police methodically lied about knowing about the "phantom polygraph" even though it was a matter of public record.
A voice stress analysis conducted by George O'Toole, a former chief of the CIA's Problems Analysis Branch, showed chief polygraph examiner Paul Bentley lying about not knowing that Frazier was polygraphed. Even if you don't accept voice stress analysis, it's impossible to believe that Bentley would forget such a significant incident. Why would Bentley lie about this polygraph, even when someone else actually conducted it? The man who conducted the polygraph, R. D. Lewis, claimed he couldn't remember it either. As stated in the FBI report, "the Dallas Police Department (was) of the opinion the brown, heavy paper was used by Oswald to carry the rifle into the building where he was working." The results of Frazier's polygraph killed that theory. Bentley wanted to see Oswald go down.[ 52 ] As mentioned in Chapter 6, even FBI agent Barrett has now labeled Bentley as a liar.
The problem with this case isn't a CT (critical-thinkers) problem. The problem all along is the BIG lie.
Somewhere in all of this, Buell Wesley Frazier should dig deep down within and do some serious soul searching and come clean. No more lies...