29-03-2016, 06:47 PM
The reason why the "name that person" challenge is not logically, legally, or debate-wise credible has been posted repeatedly. Its resubmission in a new thread is basically an indication that its issuer is aware of the merit of the Murphy-refuting evidence. Something obviously bugs the issuer. We are approaching a Cinque level of discussion at this point.
Because those who have reasonably proven that Prayer Man can't be Oswald, by a simple height comparison in Darnell, can't name the actual woman seen in Darnell is not a sound counter to the evidence that has already been shown. There's only one credible challenge at this impasse. That would be for the opposition to acknowledge and respond to the reasonable science that has shown Oswald can't be Prayer Man.
If Frazier was 6 foot in height and Prayer Man is more than obviously 6-7 inches shorter, Oswald very simply can't be Prayer Man and it really is as simple as that for those willing to admit it.
Because those who have reasonably proven that Prayer Man can't be Oswald, by a simple height comparison in Darnell, can't name the actual woman seen in Darnell is not a sound counter to the evidence that has already been shown. There's only one credible challenge at this impasse. That would be for the opposition to acknowledge and respond to the reasonable science that has shown Oswald can't be Prayer Man.
If Frazier was 6 foot in height and Prayer Man is more than obviously 6-7 inches shorter, Oswald very simply can't be Prayer Man and it really is as simple as that for those willing to admit it.