30-03-2016, 03:13 PM
You're not answering Drew's point Alan.
Drew is saying that by your logic, since you can't actually name the person seen in the 6th floor window, that you must accept it was Oswald. He's trying to show the flaw in your argument and how it is often used by Lone Nutters in the same way to deny evidence. Blowing harder with ROKC rhetoric won't compensate for this.
Still waiting for David Josephs to return and honestly discuss Darnell's lens and how reasonable conclusions can be drawn from it that counter what he previously wrote. - Since David is such a photo expert...
Drew is saying that by your logic, since you can't actually name the person seen in the 6th floor window, that you must accept it was Oswald. He's trying to show the flaw in your argument and how it is often used by Lone Nutters in the same way to deny evidence. Blowing harder with ROKC rhetoric won't compensate for this.
Still waiting for David Josephs to return and honestly discuss Darnell's lens and how reasonable conclusions can be drawn from it that counter what he previously wrote. - Since David is such a photo expert...