Challenge

[Alan Ford]

The point is, where do you go next with this fuzzy photograph? We already have much better evidence of Oswald's innocence that you can't get the media/government to pay any attention to (and almost all of us agree on). PM is an interesting thing to go hmmm about, but beyond that I don't see where it leads.

A valid point, Mr. Riddle @ We already have much better evidence of Oswald's innocence that you can't get the media/government to pay any attention to (and almost all of us agree on).

The exclamation point upon all of that evidence is the emergence of Prayer Man. The media is not part of the solution here. A Free Press, however, as intended by the Founding Fathers would have already placed an exclamation point many times over around Mr. Oswald's innocent.

Current count on the specifics in this matter:

The wrongfully accused (3) (where were you? "out front"; with who? "Billy Shelley"; and, no one else places their position in his specific location)
prayer woman (0), no specific name, let alone any specific details, which given most women's propensity to talk, no offense to Em or any other women, we should have at least something however remote to go on. Fails the "any strangers" litmus test.
prayer person (0) no specific name, let alone any specific details. Also fails the "any strangers" litmus test.

Thus the Challenge, easy to offer generics but difficult to offer any specifics. There is a reason for that.

Prayer Man, however, has offered multiple specifics. There is also a reason for that.

Speaking of specifics more detailed information relative to Prayer Man is just a ciick away ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq