Challenge

[Alan Ford]

Sarah Stanton has already been ruled out by multiple parties (Mr. Frazier and Mrs. Pauline Sanders), who stood alongside her on the polar opposite of Prayer Man's position. We know none of us can be in two places all at once.

Well Mr Ford, apparently you are among "multiple parties"that have ruled out the possibility of Ms Sarah Stanton as PrayerPerson. However, so far I cannot join the "multiple parties". As for statements made by Mr Frazier and Ms Sanders, that is your interpretation, not mine. And, considering the width of the doorway landing area, I wonder, as I wander, just how far apart multiple occupants of the area can be? But, I was hoping the identification of the lady pictured on the steps might be addressed as well. In any event, I have monitored the PrayerPerson issue about as long as I can recall that it has been an issue as discussed on this forum, and I have yet to conclude that PrayerPerson is a male. And, that all but eliminates LeeHarveyOswald being PrayerPerson, in my well studied opinion.

On the contrary, Mr. Trotter, @ me sharing merely my interpretation. Both of the aforementioned multiple parties (Mr. Frazier and Mrs. Pauline Sanders) made their own observations on the actual day of the event, sharing their respective observations in sworn statements found in Warren Commission Exhibit 1381. Within that historical document, They both place Sarah Stanton, 41, standing alongside them in a position far away from Prayer Man on the opposite end of their specific position.

Any other specific female names you care to share today?

No sir! I see no need for any additional female names at this point. And, your just repeating the same conclusions without additional strong evidence will not, in all likelihood, alter my opinion. But, I would appreciate an identification of the lady on the steps seen in the picture linked to. In any event, you all have a nice day now.

Fair enough, Mr. Trotter, once again appreciate the civil engagement.

In respect to the latter portion of your comment relative to the lady on the lower steps sir, her clothing doesn't match Prayer Man's attire (no offense to Him, she presents neat and clean while his upper garment is akin to a labor's work clothing).

in fairness to the discussion though, I am open to a follow up rebuttal, because after all isn't that what this is really all about? Seeking truth wherever evidence based research takes us.

Speaking of which, let's see where the evidence based research has brought us thus far in this Challenge:

Only one entity's existence has actually been supported by factual evidence: He was encountered at the front entrance before Officer Baker's stairway to heaven climb; He places himself six floors below outside, with a specific individual. No one else claims to have stood in His specific position. There is a reason for that.

Meanwhile, the combined efforts of prayer woman and her spawn have yet to offer a single specific evidence based fact to go on, not even one. No specific name, though everyone has a name; no credible explanation to explain away the "any strangers" litmus test; nor anyone establishing anyone else in Prayer Man's specific position. There's a reason for that.