Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Panama Papers
#68
UBS Whistleblower, Bradley Birkenfeld, joins those now damning the Panama Papers as a CIA covert operation

Quote:

Swiss Bank Whistleblower Claims Panama Papers Was a CIA Operation

Michael Krieger | Posted Tuesday Apr 12, 2016 at 11:11 am
[Image: Screen-Shot-2016-04-12-at-11.05.13-AM.jpg]
Bradley Birkenfeld is the most significant financial whistleblower of all time, so you might think he'd be cheering on the disclosures in the new Panama Papers leaks. But today, Birkenfeld is raising questions about the source of the information that is shaking political regimes around the world.
"The CIA I'm sure is behind this, in my opinion," Birkenfeld said.
From the CNBC article: Swiss Banker Whistleblower: CIA Behind Panama Papers
Last Friday, I published a post titled, Was the Panama Papers "Leak" a Russian Intelligence Operation? Here's some of what I wrote:
Initially, this seemed to be a theory worth exploring, but in the following days I've come to a far different conclusion. The primary divergence between what I currently believe and what Mr. Murray proposed is that I do not think the leaker was a genuine whistleblower motived by the public interest. I think the leaker was working on behalf of a sophisticated intelligence agency.
The fact that we seem to know nothing about "John Doe" concerns me. Say what you will about Edward Snowden, but he came out publicly shortly after his whistleblowing and offered himself up for the world to judge. His life, career and personality have been put on full display, and each and every one of us has had the opportunity to decide for ourselves whether his motivations were noble and pure or not.
With the Panama Papers' "John Doe" we are given no such opportunity, and in fact, the whole thing reads very much like a script concocted by some big budget intelligence agency. Once I started coming around to this conclusion, the obvious choice was U.S. intelligence; given the lack of implications to powerful Americans, the clownishly desperate attempts to smear Putin, and the appearance of Soros, USAID, Ford Foundation, etc, linked organizations to the reporting.
So for someone who already thinks the whole Panama Papers story stinks to high heaven, a CIA link to the release seems obvious; but is it too obvious? Perhaps.
At this point, I want to make something perfectly clear. I do not profess to know the "real story" behind the Panama Papers. The truth is, nobody knows, except for John Doe and the people he was working for (or with). The only thing I feel fairly confident about is that the story we are being fed is not the real story. The more I read and reflect upon the very minor consequences of the leak thus far, the more I become convinced this was a geopolitical play by a powerful intelligence agency. At first, I assumed it was U.S. intelligence, but Mr. Gaddy puts forth a compelling theory. If this was the work of the CIA, it was an extremely sloppy and obvious hit job. On the other hand, if this was the work of Putin for the purposes of blackmail, it's one of the most ingenious chess moves I've ever seen played on the global stage.
The main point I was trying to hammer home with that post was the fact that I did not believe the Panama Papers was an altruistic act of heroic whistleblowing, but that it was an intelligence operation. I went on to say that I thought the notion it was a Russian job was plausible merely because if it was indeed a CIA operation (as I initially suspected), we would have to accept that the agency is mind-bogglingly sloppy and clownish. Nevertheless, according to notorious Swiss bank whistleblower, Bradley Birkenfeld, this is the work of the CIA.
CNBC reports:
Bradley Birkenfeld is the most significant financial whistleblower of all time, so you might think he'd be cheering on the disclosures in the new Panama Papers leaks. But today, Birkenfeld is raising questions about the source of the information that is shaking political regimes around the world.
Birkenfeld, an American citizen, was a banker working at UBS in Switzerland when he approached the U.S. government with information on massive amounts of tax evasion by Americans with secret accounts in Switzerland. By the end of his whistleblowing career, Birkenfeld had served more than two years in a U.S. federal prison, been awarded $104 million by the IRS for his information and shattered the foundations of more than a century of Swiss banking secrecy.
In an exclusive interview Tuesday from Munich, Birkenfeld said he doesn't think the source of the 11 million documents stolen from a Panamanian law firm should automatically be considered a whistleblower like himself. Instead, he said, the hacking of the Panama City-based firm, called Mossack Fonseca, could have been done by a U.S. intelligence agency.
"The CIA I'm sure is behind this, in my opinion," Birkenfeld said.
Birkenfeld pointed to the fact that the political uproar created by the disclosures have mainly impacted countries with tense relationships with the United States. "The very fact that we see all these names surface that are the direct quote-unquote enemies of the United States, Russia, China, Pakistan, Argentina and we don't see one U.S. name. Why is that?" Birkenfeld said. "Quite frankly, my feeling is that this is certainly an intelligence agency operation."
Asked why the U.S. would leak information that has also been damaging to U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, a major American ally, Birkenfeld said the British leader was likely collateral damage in a larger intelligence operation.
"If you've got NSA and CIA spying on foreign governments they can certainly get into a law firm like this," Birkenfeld said. "But they selectively bring the information to the public domain that doesn't hurt the U.S. in any shape or form. That's wrong. And there's something seriously sinister here behind this."

This just further confirms my belief that this whole "leak" isn't what we are being told. This is the work of an intelligence agency working on behalf of a particular government, not on behalf of the public.
Don't be duped.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 03:58 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 11:11 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 11:33 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 11:43 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 11:50 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 12:00 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 12:02 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 12:13 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 12:16 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 12:18 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 12:30 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 12:47 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 12:47 PM
Panama Papers - by Drew Phipps - 04-04-2016, 01:16 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 04-04-2016, 01:17 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 04-04-2016, 01:20 PM
Panama Papers - by Tracy Riddle - 04-04-2016, 04:04 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 08:27 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 08:29 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 08:58 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 09:13 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 09:15 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 09:47 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 10:14 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 10:23 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 10:48 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 12:52 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 02:21 PM
Panama Papers - by Ralf Anders - 05-04-2016, 02:26 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 03:28 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 05-04-2016, 05:00 PM
Panama Papers - by Michael Barwell - 05-04-2016, 05:24 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 05-04-2016, 05:29 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 05-04-2016, 05:31 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 05-04-2016, 05:56 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 06-04-2016, 05:53 AM
Panama Papers - by Peter Lemkin - 06-04-2016, 06:08 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 06-04-2016, 07:29 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 06-04-2016, 07:31 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 06-04-2016, 07:46 AM
Panama Papers - by Peter Lemkin - 06-04-2016, 09:07 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 06-04-2016, 12:59 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 06-04-2016, 03:44 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 06-04-2016, 03:57 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 06-04-2016, 04:19 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 06-04-2016, 04:21 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 06-04-2016, 04:24 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 06-04-2016, 05:01 PM
Panama Papers - by Lauren Johnson - 06-04-2016, 05:13 PM
Panama Papers - by R.K. Locke - 06-04-2016, 07:00 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 07-04-2016, 07:47 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 07-04-2016, 08:48 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 07-04-2016, 12:24 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 07-04-2016, 12:46 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 08-04-2016, 08:12 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 08-04-2016, 08:32 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 08-04-2016, 08:39 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 08-04-2016, 09:08 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 08-04-2016, 10:01 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 08-04-2016, 10:04 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 08-04-2016, 10:12 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 11-04-2016, 10:46 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 11-04-2016, 02:07 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 12-04-2016, 11:58 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 13-04-2016, 08:20 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 13-04-2016, 10:19 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 13-04-2016, 11:09 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 13-04-2016, 11:12 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 15-04-2016, 11:18 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 15-04-2016, 12:04 PM
Panama Papers - by Drew Phipps - 15-04-2016, 01:07 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 15-04-2016, 02:03 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 16-04-2016, 11:32 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 16-04-2016, 11:36 AM
Panama Papers - by Drew Phipps - 16-04-2016, 12:36 PM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 16-04-2016, 02:18 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 16-04-2016, 02:34 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 22-04-2016, 08:02 AM
Panama Papers - by Magda Hassan - 22-04-2016, 09:20 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 22-04-2016, 10:00 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 11-05-2016, 09:02 AM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 11-05-2016, 11:21 AM
Panama Papers - by Tracy Riddle - 11-05-2016, 04:34 PM
Panama Papers - by David Guyatt - 21-06-2016, 09:41 AM
Panama Papers - by Tobias Zackrisson - 29-08-2016, 12:56 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)