Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Can We Agree?
#17
There's two arguments here. One is that we need to precisely define every single aspect of the assassination perfectly. The unspoken suggestion is that we cannot act effectively until we do this. The second argument is that, at the point we are right now, we have enough reasonable evidence to show elements of the national security infrastructure were involved in Kennedy's assassination in reaction to the interests of powerful sponsors in American society.


I'd have to give the nod to the latter. Whether or not entire agencies were involved, the way our system is supposed to work is that once those agencies failed to protect the American public from the traitors who murdered JFK they failed and were no longer credible. The sad truth is that America was supposed to be a country formed by revolution and not shy about it. The people should have gone to revolution immediately once they even suspected members of the government overthrew our democracy with the killing of Kennedy.


I've existed long enough in the assassination internet world to be able to detect persons who convert fear of acting to calls for better evidence. These same people complain that we are prolonging the issue as the plotters intended but then make calls themselves for more examination and talk. More perfecting of evidence. The Kennedy assassination is still on the national docket and still needs to have justice done on it and be resolved. Our system is designed to let evidence and truth rule. It has been in a state of non-working dysfunction ever since they killed the Kennedy's. When treason is committed in such a brazen manner that corrupts American democracy to the degree it did the requirements of evidence fall to a much lower level than normal for the sake of justice and defense against the advantage such insidious actions enjoy. An advantage that was meant to be countered by the very system they overthrew. It is becoming clear the founding fathers trusted the guarding of their creation to a public that was not up to the challenge and did not carry out their responsibility when confronted with the murder of the Kennedy's by fascist elements within the government. For those who still believe in democracy the only recourse is realization that the present American government is not a legitimate one and may it be declared that it is now deserving of the fate of such rogue states that stand in opposition to themselves...
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Can We Agree? - by Jim Hargrove - 22-04-2016, 02:50 AM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 22-04-2016, 03:22 AM
Can We Agree? - by Jim Hargrove - 22-04-2016, 03:38 AM
Can We Agree? - by R.K. Locke - 23-04-2016, 01:00 AM
Can We Agree? - by Magda Hassan - 23-04-2016, 10:00 AM
Can We Agree? - by Drew Phipps - 23-04-2016, 01:41 PM
Can We Agree? - by Jim Hargrove - 23-04-2016, 04:05 PM
Can We Agree? - by Lauren Johnson - 23-04-2016, 04:52 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 23-04-2016, 06:12 PM
Can We Agree? - by Lauren Johnson - 23-04-2016, 07:59 PM
Can We Agree? - by LR Trotter - 23-04-2016, 08:15 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 23-04-2016, 08:51 PM
Can We Agree? - by LR Trotter - 23-04-2016, 09:35 PM
Can We Agree? - by Tracy Riddle - 24-04-2016, 01:01 AM
Can We Agree? - by R.K. Locke - 24-04-2016, 12:06 PM
Can We Agree? - by Tracy Riddle - 24-04-2016, 01:22 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 24-04-2016, 04:56 PM
Can We Agree? - by Jim Hargrove - 25-04-2016, 02:18 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 25-04-2016, 05:16 PM
Can We Agree? - by Jim Hargrove - 26-04-2016, 12:30 AM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 27-04-2016, 04:59 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 29-04-2016, 04:57 PM
Can We Agree? - by Albert Doyle - 31-05-2016, 10:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)