Poking More Holes in Judyth Baker

[David Josephs]

My original point has never changed:

The Copy B Withholding form SHE AND FETZER use to prove Baker worked at Reily - does not match a single other 1963 W-2 form from any state or from any federal printing run.
What I simply requested was for her to produce another 1963 form which positions the name above the amounts. This has never been done. Like so many items - these forms are props.

JVB from her Facebook page:

" ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. I have now been accused of creating a fraudulent W2 form! Both David Josephs and Dawn Meredith keep claiming I fake my records. Together they went on the Education Forum to claim that no such W2 form B as I show for Reily ever existed. Josephs wrote: "Thanks Dawn...Has she ever been able to explain having the wrong copy (B copy) of a W-2 from 1963 which never existed as a form. For those who have not seen the comparison.... The 1963 W-2 reflects the reordered [sic] tax & wage boxes from 1962. [JVB: THIS ISN'T TRUE. THE W2 FORMS WERE SENT EARLY IN 1964 REPORTING 1963 WAGES. AND I WOULD HAVE EXPLAINED THIS BEFORE NOW, BUT DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THIS FALSE ACCUSATION. THEY NEVER TELL ME WHAT THEIR LATEST MESS-UP IS ABOUT.]

As I show in the next image and as Dawn reiterated, of the 4 boxes for income and taxes above the name of the taxpayer, the 1[SUP]st[/SUP]/2[SUP]nd[/SUP] and 3[SUP]rd[/SUP]/4[SUP]th[/SUP] boxes were simply switched with each other between the 1962 year and 1963 year. Nothing else changed. JVB's response appears to show her confusion over the issue and is telling us that 1963 W-2 reflect 1963 wages - which everyone knows.

I started here thinking that maybe the 1963 forms DID change to look like JVB's Reily form... not so much





THIS is the form JVB offered to prove she worked with Oswald May-June-July 1963. From the arguments JVB offers, Different State's forms are different therefor ALL 1963 Louisiana Federal Tax Forms SHOULD the same.

My question was why keep Copy B when it is clear to this genius and anyone who can read, what to do with the forms?





JVB responds to the "Part B" question"
P.S. : ROBERT AND I BOTH KEPT OUR Louisiana W2 FORM B'S BECAUSE WE WERE NAIVE. WE HAD NEVER FILLED OUT ANY TAX FORMS BEFORE 1964. NOBODY EVER CONTACTED US ABOUT NOT SENDING THEM IN

Naive? This is a woman who has been performing complex experimentation for years, a prodigy, a genius yet cannot read or follow directions?

It follows then that she would kept ALL 1963 W-2 form copy B's, no? yet we have a Copy C on the correct federal form for the ChemResearch Florida Job which in turn matches her husband Roberts Copy C from Louisiana (a different State) also from 1963? (very bottom images) but we'll get there.


Both did work in Louisiana in 1963, both got a number of W-2 forms to submit with their taxes.

The bottom form, just below, is NOT A FEDERAL FORM but a "State of Louisiana" form - nothing on it says "Federal".
Accordingly Robert would have his "Federal" Withholding form for 1963 (not shown) and Judyth would have a 1963 "State of LA" tax form like her husband's.. (also not shown or offered as evidence)

If these were the only two forms for both that year maybe we could understand the Naivete. But the Bakers had at least 2 more W-2 forms from 1963






Before we get to these other 2 forms which directly refutes each one of Judyths explanations, she sets herself up :

JVB Write: JOSEPHS FALSELY ASSUMED THAT ALL W2 FORM B'S WERE THE SAME FOR EVERY STATE (!!!!). NOT SO.
IF ANYTHING, THIS SHOWS HOW AUTHENTIC AND RELIABLE MY RECORDS ARE, AND HOW FLAWED THE ATTACKS OF MY ACCUSERS ARE


According to Judyth's argument - Louisiana and Florida have different FEDERAL FORMS... yet when we look below at the generic 1963, Peninsular in FLORIDA, and EVANGELINE in LOUISIANA
we can easily see they are all the same - Taxpayer's name below the income and tax amounts... and all the lines and text written the same way and in the same place

Only the REILY Copy is different - although it's the same state and same year as her husbands 1963 form. ooops IS Copy B any different from Copy C?
Well, if you look again at the top image, 1962 to 1963, Copy B is identical to C regarding where the names and amounts are placed.


Yes indeed - Judyth shows exactly how authentic and reliable the information she uses to support her story actually is...

Florida and Louisiana with EXACTLY the same 1963 federal form (Peninsular & Evangeline), a STATE FORM from Louisiana being different as expected
and finally her Reily form from 1963 & Louisiana just like her husband's from Evangeline in 1963 in Louisiana - yet they could not be any more different.

In every case her answers only bury her authenticity that much deeper.
As a scientist she should know a lot better - the evidence shown here proves that FEDERAL TAX FORMS are in fact the same across the states related to FEDERAL income (there is no "state" box for income and taxes which is not added for many years) so states would provide "STATE" tax forms as shown above for Louisiana) The only different form offered is Judyth's 1963 Reily Copy B which offers a layout not found on any other Federal Tax form in the 50's 60's or 70's. There is a book of forms underneath the image....

From where do tax forms in a book like that, in that layout, come? and why can we not find a single other example of a 1963 Copy B that looks like that?

In Addition, if she can ever address Anna Lewis' repeated statement that she dated Oswald in LA between Jan-Apr 1962 while he was with Marina and baby June in Russia - it might help shed some light.
Her close friend Anna Lewis - while Judyth is sitting behind her off camera - tells us TWICE in the same interview, that Oswald and Judyth dated with her and her husband to be between Jan & April 1962 while our man Harvey is in Minsk with Marina around the time June is born.

THESE are the 2 main supporting bits of evidence for her having been with Oswald that summer.... she even claimed to John Armstrong that people mistook her for Marina as late as September. When John reminded her Marina was 8 months pregnant at the time and inquired if she was as well to complete the charade - that was the end of the discussion.

This SECRET relationship continued with them "riding the same bus to and from work"