06-06-2016, 05:29 PM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:This is why I don't like arguing with Doyle about this subject.
Jim, you're clearly avoiding acknowledging evidence. If you read Janney there's enough detail about Leary's reaction to Mary Meyers' death that he must have had the relationship Janney claims. You don't go out on your roof to meditate in shock for a person you don't know. This is the real common sense here that you seem to be avoiding. Also, there's enough detail, names, and places in Janney for Leary's New York-based investigation of Mary Meyers' death for it to be real.
I believe this letter is important because it shows JFK was getting loose and free during his ultimate peace moves. So much so that he risked openly inviting the single most person who would be sympathetic and receptive to them up to the Cape. To think Mary Meyer was not fully conscious of the import of this crescendo is to ignore reality in my opinion and avoid the obvious. She was an intelligent woman, which was part of her attractiveness to JFK, and not one who would miss the significance of this in relation to Kennedy's assassination, or miss an opportunity to expose it.
Forgive me Jim, but your feelings towards arguing this with me are totally irrelevant to the facts being discussed here. You seem to be practicing research by ridicule.
.