09-06-2016, 03:47 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Before you think of closing it, please consider this:
Doyle on June 6th:
I am also forced to mention that this site does not allow Lone Nutters. At some point an evaluation has to be made if denial of Harvey & Lee and Janney, and backing of notorious sites, requires accountability on that account in regard to the very real assassination of Mary Meyer by CIA and how it relates to Kennedy's assassination.
Doyle, two days later:
You're putting words in my mouth that I didn't say Jim.
It clearly means that since the site does not allow Lone Nutters that therefore denial of real evidence that equals Lone Nutter denial should not be allowed either. It is clearly saying that in the same sense of restricting Lone Nutters, that denial of real evidence should also be disallowed or at least evaluated in the same sense that Lone Nutter denial is.
But honestly, wouldn't it be the shorter route to answer the points of evidence I spelled-out instead of parsing semantics?
Jim, you spoke at the ROKC conference. ROKC is rabidly anti-Armstrong. Hargrove's latest Armstrong entry is very strong evidence of the legitimacy of the Harvey & Lee theory. I believe it merits an explanation since you yourself specialize in calling out people's associations with bad sources.
(Apologies to Drew. Perhaps it should go to another thread)