14-08-2011, 06:48 AM
Gary Severson Wrote:What assumptions Ed? Read about the UN and JFK in James Douglas' "JFK & the UNSPEAKABLE". I asked Ted Sorensen what he thought JFK would think about man made global warming. He said without a doubt he would think man was the source of warming. I guess the UN's attempts to stop global warming would get JFK's applause.
You are going to have to be more specific, Gary. I own both versions of the book and the UN doesn't show up as an indexed item in either one of them. I do see references to two speeches JFK gave at the UN on nuclear test-ban treaties and nuclear disarmament. Was he lobbying for nuclear proliferation? Did he authorize the development of mutagenic warfare?
I don't see how this demonstrates that JFK should be considered a eugenicist. I don't see eugenics noted in the JFKU index either. If you are suggesting that JFK is a eugenicist because he was aware of the explosion in world population, that is fine; but that awareness doesn't make him a eugenicist. If you have something more, put it on the table; it'll be news to me. And I'd like to hear the logic spelled out, if you don't mind.
There's lots of information suggesting that a lot of people who would make the list of mechanics, facilitators or sponsors of JFK's assassination were oriented that way, but why would they kill one of their own ensconced in the White House and who was working on preventing nuclear holocaust?
And I'd like to hear the logic you used to derive the supposition that JFK was a eugenicist from the article I posted. Spell it out and parse it for those of us who are less adept at seeing these things.
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"

