Orlando, Fla. (home of giant theme parks) has 2 high profile murders in under 24 hours

[Peter Lemkin]

From Kurt Richard Haskell (FB):

Here is my very short take on The Orlando false flag from everything I have seen and heard this week. I am pretty sure this is close to the truth of what happened:1. A drill was taking place that went live.
2. Orlando PD thought it was a drill and stood down.
3. There were 3 shooters that killed some people but not everyone listed.
4. Omar Mateen is a CIA asset and is still alive.
5. The chief medical examiner was hired on condition that he cover this up.
6. This was a CIA/FBI plot.
7. The shooters were trained in the Muslim school in Orlando with James Wesley Holmes (the Santa Monica guy) and his co-conspirator. Such school is run by the CIA to train CIA assets for their upcoming missions.
8. This was to be a joint false flag with Santa Monica.
9. Crisis actors were used solely to spin the narrative.
10. Real people were injured but they have been threatened to not talk or they will be killed (Remember, they just witnessed people being killed).
11. The death toll was greatly exaggerated to make this the "worst shooting ever"
12. The owner of the club was in on it and offered her club for the drill on a promise that it would be rebuilt new after the drill.
13. The hospital is also in on the plot. The hospital was told that some of the injured went to other hospitals so it can't confirm the official numbers. Also, as it was part of the drill, it signed a confidentiality agreement.
14. The calls Omar Mateen made during the event were to his handlers.
15. The motives for this plot were many.
16. The guns and ammunition were brought into the club ahead of time as part of the drill.

A few of the above seem like leaps into the unknowable without some proofs I've not yet seen. There was a drill in October of last year for nurses et al. simulating mass casualties - haven't yet heard of any ongoing at the time of the incident, nor that the shooter is alive et al. I'll agree it was in part false flag; but to then imply that every part of it was faked, without proofs, can do harm to the research community - though everyone is free to speculate and believe in what they believe.

How the officials can explain away [for example] the crisis actors moving a 'wounded' person TOWARD the club [not away] and then when they think they are out of camera range putting the 'wounded' man down on his feet [and dancing around and LAUGHING - defies logic that this event was as presented or a totally 'real' event. Also, that many of these 'helpers' of the wounded are known actors with facebook pages is MORE than suspicious. Other aspects also make the official version obviously faked or wrong, in whole or in part; however, I think we need to be careful as to what we alternatively believe actually happened. Rejecting the official version is, I believe, warranted - however, EXACTLY what did happen is far from yet established, IMHO. Suspicion and doubt are called for....but supporting any alternatives with evidence or facts will go a long to convincing the public and keeping credibility for those who challenge the official versions of 'terror' attacks.