26-07-2016, 12:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 27-07-2016, 08:52 AM by David Guyatt.)
It's this
Okay Cliff, I'll bite. But please explain further what you mean "it's Putin?" Do you mean the US neocons will do anything to regime change him because they consider him the real problem - and that without him Russia would become adequately Yeltsinized again and compliant to US requirements?
David Guyatt Wrote:This says to me: let's not read the message, lets focus on the envelope it arrived in.
Donald Trump advocates for Putin friendly policies at every turn and brags about his connection to Russia.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/tr...-in-russia
Donald Trump is in deep with Russian financial interests.
Tony Blair was in deep with US financial interests and that wasn't much appreciated, eh?
Whatever is published by Wikileaks is regarded by the US establishment as being enemy communications. Julian Assange remains a de facto prisoner in the London embassy of Ecuador ONLY because of US pressure on its ally. This despite the ruling by the UN that his residence there is an "arbitrary detention".
Personally speaking, I do find today's McCarthy era redux - the obsession with the "Russians" that has occupied the US and western media for the past couple of years to be utterly sickening.
It's Putin.
Anti-Putin isn't necessarily anti-Russian.
Propaganda is obnoxious and it is especially obnoxious when it is thrust at you with such obvious intent on a daily basis.
I offer the charade that was House Resolution 758:
"Whereas the Russian Federation has subjected Ukraine to a
campaign of political, economic and military aggression
for the purposes of establishing it dominion over the
country and progressively erasing its independence"
A clearer case of projection I have rarely seen. The resolution continues onwards as it fulminates with lies and misinformation.
Had the opening paragraph substituted the words "United States" in place of "Russian Federation", this statement might bear some semblance to accuracy.
But then the last thing Washington wanted (or wants) is honesty. And the mainstream media are ditto.
Okay Cliff, I'll bite. But please explain further what you mean "it's Putin?" Do you mean the US neocons will do anything to regime change him because they consider him the real problem - and that without him Russia would become adequately Yeltsinized again and compliant to US requirements?