03-08-2016, 02:44 PM
David Guyatt Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:Would you agree with the proposition that the assassination of JFK was a deep political event? And the government charged Oswald as the lone nut? Does that make it true?
You will know that I repeatedly say that I am far from an expert on JFK, which is why I largely stay away from that folder and that subject. But yes, almost every aspect of the JFK assassination was deeply political, including the assassination itself, the reason and motives for it, and the need to frame and then kill Oswald and present him as the lone nut in order to cloak and protect those actually guilty of the coup d'etat.
Similarly, in this case, I think we have 88 (or 99, or 130, or 60,000...) patsies. And the case against them will be based on lies, innuendo, and supposition. Let's hope they survive.
"All that is necessary for tyranny to succeed is for good men to do nothing." (unknown)
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."
James Tracy: "There is sometimes an undue amount of paranoia among some conspiracy researchers that can contribute to flawed observations and analysis."
Gary Cornwell (Dept. Chief Counsel HSCA): "A fact merely marks the point at which we have agreed to let investigation cease."
Alan Ford: "Just because you believe it, that doesn't make it so."