03-08-2016, 05:07 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:David Guyatt Wrote:Drew Phipps Wrote:Would you agree with the proposition that the assassination of JFK was a deep political event? And the government charged Oswald as the lone nut? Does that make it true?
You will know that I repeatedly say that I am far from an expert on JFK, which is why I largely stay away from that folder and that subject. But yes, almost every aspect of the JFK assassination was deeply political, including the assassination itself, the reason and motives for it, and the need to frame and then kill Oswald and present him as the lone nut in order to cloak and protect those actually guilty of the coup d'etat.
Similarly, in this case, I think we have 88 (or 99, or 130, or 60,000...) patsies. And the case against them will be based on lies, innuendo, and supposition. Let's hope they survive.
Except there are no real similarities in this case.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14