22-09-2009, 08:34 PM
A 'rant' based on research, compiled between 2001 and 2006, PART 1
by ewing2001
Gen. Michael V. Hayden, currently Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence
has also served as Commander of the Air Intelligence Agency
and as Director of the Joint Command and Control Warfare Center.
But more important, he was also former head of the NSA (March 1999 - April 2005).
The role of the NSA regarding 9/11, and ironically also the 9/11 truth 'community',
is consequently dismissed and ignored by many '9/11 truthseekers'.
Apparently because some particular '9/11 authors'
and self appointed '9/11 activist leaders'
distracted too much with 'CIA, Cheney and the Pentagon'.
It was always clear, why.
To also delay or distract from all physical evidence, based on military operations,
scripted by the NSA and their private contractors.
The NSA, but also the NASA had their eyes not only on the 9/11 "plotline"
but also on the "military operation" of 9/11.
More closely than any other U.S. Government Agency.
The National Security Agency (NSA) has traditionally influenced
and been a very early and sophisticated user of the highest performance
of commercial computer, storage, and networking systems.
That includes also the Internet and the internet "daisy committees" of the NSA.
These are unidentified online trolls, which nicknames share different I.P. addresses,
though only impostering 'one and the same user'.
However this "user", represented with a nickname
is also able to post 24/7 on particular discussion boards, apparently without any sleep.
The NSA can also basically login and monitor all important databases of the U.S.,
especially aviation databases.
Among them the National Flight Database (NFD).
Current data elements included are:
Airports and Heliports,
Standard Terminal Arrival Procedures (STARs),
GPS and RNAV (GPS) or Runways for airports that have a SIAP coded in the NFD.
Would the NSA 'log in' on the morning on Sep11th?
Sure they would.
That's why they also know, that the BTS database of the FAA already proves,
that "AA77" and "AA11" did not exist on the morning of 9/11.
The NSA knew all alleged passengers on the morning of Sep11th.
They know this faster than the FBI or CIA.
They know which plane does exist and which doesn't.
They also know in real time, what really happened in NYC, Shanksville and
at the Pentagon, because of less stress of 'competence'.
In other words, the NSA are important part of the perpetrators who 'did 9/11'.
"The CIA did 9/11" is instead distraction language of many "9/11 truthlings",
based on a dried out old school meme of the 80s.
This meme often also includes other inane 'NWO'-drivel like endless distractions
of esoterical traps like "MK-ULTRA" or "drug business", to water down the issue.
The 'CIA-talk' often distracts on alleged on-topic 'discussion forums' with other off-topics,
which immediately deceive their online members with secondary 'research'
or even pseudo-religious agenda, new age cults and other historical sideshows.
Often "CIA researchers" find themselves quickly among associates of "TWA800 researchers"
or worse: "JFK researchers" or "moonflight hoax debunkers".
The strategy is obvious.
To distract from Sep11th with either paranoia or "80s conspiracy theories".
"The Mossad did it"-meme has a similar strategy, though it clearly distracts
with other obvious agendas, often even conflicting each other,
which has the same purpose: Divide and Conquer.
Right after 9/11, self appointed "Mossad researchers", often end up
in debates on historical research from over 2000-3000 years ago,
which is even more effective.
The 'CIA distraction' also helps to stir a fight between
the supporters of the 'mossad distraction'
and the 'CIA-NWO' sensationalists,
often also accused as "zionists", especially if you deny ANY complicity of the Mossad.
But what has 'complicity' to do with the actual performance of the inside operation?
Basically the same complicity of the so called '9/11 cover-up'
can also be easily constructed with the dutch-, german-, saudi- or pakistani intelligence.
The result is an endless debate on whether the one or other agency had more or
less participation into 9/11.
What almost noone realizes, all these 'complicities' refer in the majority to the plotline,
not the military operation.
Therefore it doesn't matter if either CIA, BND, MOSSAD, Dutch Intelligence or "Able Danger" "observed" or "impostered" the alleged hijackers.
It all represents just the 'plotline' and distracts from
the controlled demolition or the so called "controversial" TV fakery research.
(http://www.911closeup.com/nico/FAQ_planehuggers.html )
The "CIA connection" was also designed to distract from the private military-
and intelligence contractors (PMCs), which already replaced and dominated
U.S. Intelligence anyway.
Another "distraction", not less effective, is the "Bush did it" meme,
which helps to distract with post 9/11' -"scandals" of the White House or Pentagon,
to keep false hope campaigners or the complete 'anti-war movement' busy.
The same "bush did it" meme also automatically triggers other inane 'activist drivel' on prior knowledge red herrings like Jeb or Marvin Bush.
That's why also so called leftgatekeepers are still clueless about the real players
of many other new 'setups' against their own citizens:
Among them In-Q-Tel, Titan Corp., BoozAllen Hamilton, CSC/DynCorp, SAIC and many others.
The NSA has their own satellite surveillance trackers, developed by SAIC
and other private intelligence contractors.
(* see also
SAIC- power structure 9/11 and more
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/...c.php?1664)
On the morning of Sep11th, the NSA did not follow any particular standard government-
and military procedure or any other logistics, therefore cannot be accused of "negligence".
There also was no "Rumsfeld around".
Neither a silly "Rove influence", "Cheney" or "Joe Wilson",
all carefully designed limited hangout puppets.
Truthlings and Gatekeepers apparently watched too many soap operas.
If the name isn't known to them, it isn't 'cool' to talk about.
That's why more important players of the 9/11 perps never arrived
on any '9/11 truth flyer', among them:
Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, Jay C Davis (ANSER), James Woolsey, Ruth David,
James R. Clapper, Duane (Dewey) Clarridge, Andrew W. "Yoda" Marshall,
Scott Myers, Eliot Cohen, Christopher Demut, Thomas S. Foley,
Charles Holland, David Jeremiah, Michael Ledeen, Norman Podhoretz,
Bruce P. Jackson, the Naudet Brothers, the Club of Rome, Raytheon and many others.
That's why also the role of the NSA is underrepresented in this 'truth movement',
because much closer to the truth than anyone else.
That's why cointel-pro still succesfully runs or
deceives the biggest 'activist' groups in the 9/11 truth movement.
Anyone knows, that the Heritage Foundation runs meetup.com,
where most of the 'activists' met in the first time?
Obviously the majority doesn't.
"Profile producers" are less important than "profile paranoia".
When 'Civil Right activists' try to distract with "controversial surveillance facts" on the NSA,
they follow a clear script from their leadership groups, itself also infiltrated by government agents
or sponsored by right wing think tanks, ironically also often close to the CIA.
The same or similar pattern can be also seen in the 'alternative media'.
Often cited in this connection:
DemocracyNow!, FAIR, Nation, PBS or truthout.org.
It not only helps as a gatekeeper distraction from 9/11,
it also helps to increase the limited hangout agenda
for the political theatre.
However the role of the NSA for both 9/11 'plotline' and 'military operation',
but also 'disinformation front' and 'surveillance industry' regarding 9/11 'activists'
is much more important.
It wasn't the CIA, but apparently the NSA with their most advanced high tech,
which really was in charge of the so called "9/11 plotline".
However the official 'plotline' of 9/11 had nothing to do with the military operation.
The 'plotline' of 9/11 helped as most important distraction, even still in 2006.
While the 9/11 perpetrators used the CIA as helpful distraction idiots,
the NSA knew exactly who observed whom
in the 'plotline' and when the 'military operation' would take place:
"Tomorrow is Zero hour" (September 10th, 2001)
The alleged suspects of 9/11 met next to Fort Meade.
Also, it was ex-NSA agent Linda Mills (BENS), who lived in the same city as
some of the alleged suspects of 9/11.
And BENS helped creating the Tail to Tooth Commission,
an important tool for the neocons and PNAC.
BENS is located in front of the White House (1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20570).
Chairman Stanley A. Weiss is a member of the
Advisory Board of RAND's Center for Middle East
Public Policy, a member of the CFRand writes for Journal sentinel.
Members of BENS are also:
Norman R. Augustine (Director Lockheed Martin),
David S. Browning (Vice President of Schlumberger),
Daniel H. Case, III (Chase),
Rudy de Leon (Senior VP, Boeing),
Victor Ganzi (The Hearst Corporation),
Richard Grasso (New York Stock Exchange),
Frank W. Jenkins (SAIC),
Paul V. Lombardi (President and CEO of DynCorp),
Stephen T. McClellan (Merryl Lynch),
Philip A. Odeen (TRW),
Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A. Schwarzman (Blackstone Group).
Significantly, all these companies have extreme close ties
with particular elements of '9/11 research', some of them also
represent distractive issues like 'put options', 'war', 'media control' or 'oil industry'.
The "military operation" of 9/11 therefore also included a P.R. and media operation and
was a close cooperation with their very own private military- and intelligence contractors:
AMEC
AMEC renovated the wedge of the Pentagon, which 'coincidentally' was attacked on Sep11th.
Then also AMEC was in charge to remove the rubble of the Pentagon, but also from Ground Zero.
Among other contractors: Tully Inc., which subcontracted Controlled Demolotion Inc.
(* see also
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/...c.php?2173
The AMEC- Turner-WTC 7 connection)
HONEYWELL
Honeywell produced the cockpit recorder, which was officially found in Shanksville.
Two Honeywell employees 'followed' the Colgan Flight of 'Mohammad Atta'.
WESCAM
A high tech military camera system (meanwhile belonging to L3 Communications),
installed on an unidentified and prepositioned helicopter,
which filmed the only available "live" footage of the 2nd attack.
This 'footage' was then exclusively wired to W-ABC (ABC7) which synched their
final camera operator position feed 11 seconds (!) before the 2nd attack took place,
with CNN, FOX and NBC. (CBS had no 'live aired footage')
Also, it was the hangar of the NASA (NASA Glenn Research) in Cleveland,
where unidentified passengers of two U.S. flights (among them Delta 1989)
had been interrogated by the FBI.
Strangely "Delta 1989" was only forced to land in Cleveland,
because it had the same flight pattern as "United175", officially hijacked on that morning.
Oddly also the other flight was early identified as "United93",
confirmed by Mayor Michael R. White and 9News Staff (Liz Foreman),
which later denied the accurancy of their story.
The CIA (same to FBI) was also used as a distraction for the 'limited hangout' to divert
not only attention away from the NSA but also NRO and NIMA (later renamed into NGA).
The National Imagery and Mapping Agency was also known as "the 'eyes of America'
On August 8th, 2001 (two days after Bush received a new PDB with a clear warning on Bin Laden),
James R. Clapper was announced as new head of NRO.
The countdown for 9/11 continued.
These 3 intelligence agencies had been already in charge
during the mid 90s to develop a so called
'secret surveillance project', closely also linked to former Reagan's "Star Wars",
which was in reality well known,
even for U.S. Congress:
ECHELON and PROJECT TRAILBLAZER.
During 1998/1999, under Bill Clinton, the NSA and NRO handed out their first contracts of "Trailblazer"
to almost a dozen of less known private military- and intelligence contractors.
In the same years, controversy breaks out over the NSA "Echelon" project.
U.S. Congress 'figured' a problem with Echelon and looked into it.
However in 1999 both General Hayden (NSA) and George Tenet (CIA) neither denied or confirmed
the existance of Echelon and their sub contractors.
If they would have confirmed the existance of Echelon and its sub projects,
noone would have believed into negligence on the morning of Sep11th.
The denial was therefore most important, because 9/11 was already in planning.
In March 2001, Logicon TASC officially announced their five-year,
$57 million contract for "Trailblazer".
'Logicon' was in reality a team of others:
"Logicon Task Team", part of Northrop Grumman, included Veridian (in 2003 aquired by General Dynamics),
Advent Systems Inc., Mountain View, EDS, Advanced Engineering & Sciences,
RDR Inc., SRS Technologies.
Another subcontractor of Logicon TASK (diff. sp.)
became Modern Technologies Corporation (MTC) of Dayton.
MTC included Kenneth A. Minihan (ex-NSA, ex-DIA) and General Lawrence A. Skantze (ex -U.S. Air Force).
(http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/n...oryid=1074
The lost terror drill- Pt.11 B )
Veridian includes Neil Armstrong (former space missions during 60s).
This brings us also directly to a popular example
for an infiltration hipothesis of the 9/11 "truth" movement:
Neil Armstrong's sister is married with Jack Hoffman,
who is interestingly the uncle of '9/11 author' Jim Hoffman,
recently again accused as disinfo provocateur
(against the "Loose Change" people).
Hoffman's former institute is sponsored by the NSA, NSF and ONR (Office of Naval Research)
http://www.msri.org/people/staff/jim/
http://www.msri.org/sponaff/Support_Federal
After Jim Hoffman plagiarized his 'wtc7' research from the '9/11 science and justice alliance',
he oddly turned into a so called "planehugger"
(supportive of the idea that a plane crashed into the Pentagon,
in Shanksville and into both Twin Towers)
Back to 'Trailblazer':
Some parts of this program had been also developed in the very same wedge,
which was attacked on 9/11.
The 'pentagon attack' not only 'wiped out' the Office of Naval Intelligence,
but also three employees of James Woolsey's Booz Allen Hamilton.
Woolsey (ex-CIA director and PNAC)'s company was working on "Trailblazer".
Also killed: two employees from BTG Inc., another sub contractor of Trailblazer.
Only 10 days after Sep11th, BTG Inc. was suddenly purchased by Woolsey's other former company,
Titan Corporation.
Needless to say, Titan was another main contracter of Trailblazer
since 1998 (contracted by both NSA and NRO).
Coincidence?
What "role" did the NRO really play?
The NRO is main suspect among some '9/11 truthseekers' for the Pentagon attack,
with the cover of a live terror exercise drill on the morning of Sep11th.
Again, this also helped to re-establish the myth for an alleged commercial aircraft at the Pentagon.
A terrorist drill which was "cancelled", but in reality took place but didn't include a real plane either.
When the importance of the pre 9/11-terror drill research in general became more popular
(among them also the terror drill exercise for the anthrax attack during June 2001, "Dark Winter"),
9/11 research frauds had to establish another plagiarization and distraction:
The so called "wargames-focus" and the alleged "Cheney mastermind" role was therefore created
to divert attention away from the terror drill run-up for 9/11, and build yet another limited hangout.
Once again, the 9/11 truth movement was fooled and still is, because most of the 'wargame activists'
ended up as 'peak oil fanatics' or started to talk about 'global warming' or 'alternative energy'.
Coincidence?
Not if you know, who and why these distractions had been scripted into this movement.
It helped to delay and later control the activists of the "controlled demolition".
It helped to either discourage or depress many 'activists' in general
or keep them busy with false hope campaigns.
And it helped to distract from NSA, NGA and NRO.
The researcher who found out about all this, was labelled
as "erratic".
All other supportive associates labelled as 'wackos' or 'insane'.
Case closed. But that was 2003/04.
Why is the NRO much more important than the CIA?
The NRO was established in 1960 to develop the nation's revolutionary satellite reconnaissance systems.
It was endorsed by Dwight D. Eisenhower in February 1958
after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first orbital satellite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Re...nce_Office
The existence of the NRO was declassified by the Deputy Secretary of Defense,
as recommended by the Director of Central Intelligence on September 18, 1992.
The Director of the NRO is appointed by the Secretary of Defense
with the consent of the Director of National Intelligence,
without confirmation from U.S. Congress.
(In July 2005 Donald M. Kerr was approved as new Director of the NRO)
In late 2001, "Trailblazer" (just another sub project and codename of Echelon and others)
was integrated into "Misty".
The information was still 'classified'.
Finally during December 2004, the so called 'classified' project, popped up in U.S. mainstream media.
Now described as "controversial spy satellite program" or "stealth satellite program",
it was debated by some U.S. congress members, among them Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Finally General Michael Hyden (NSA) somehow confirmed, that this 'spy satellite program'
was a cooperation between the NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency), the NSA
and NRO.
Hyden also confirmed, that Lockheed was then picked as one of the main contractors
for this Satellite Surveillance program.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2...-misty.htm
On December 8, 2004, Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia,
the senior Democrat on the Intelligence Committee,
"complained" ...that the spy project was "totally unjustified and very,
very wasteful and dangerous to the national security."
Rockefeller and three other Democratic senators -
Richard Durbin of Illinois, Carl Levin of Michigan
and Ron Wyden of Oregon - refused to support this 'secret project'.
It took only 3 weeks to kill the debate and approve the project.
It was the result of an officially labelled 'natural disaster':
The Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, followed by a series of tsunamis throughout the Indian Ocean,
killing large numbers of people and devastating coastal communities in Indonesia,
Sri Lanka, India, Thailand, and elsewhere.
Meanwhile, noone in U.S. Congress,
especially 'since Katrina' argues about any 'satellite surveillance threat' anymore.
While so called 'weather modification theorists' are getting accused as 'paranoid'
and/or 'without any evidence', the coincidental timing of these events should make some people
think, especially since U.S. Congress already debating two Weather Modification Bills.
Meanwhile also Hayden has the guts to claim, "had this program been in effect prior to 9/11, it is my professional judgment that we would have detected some of the 9/11 al-Qaida operatives in the United States, and we would have identified them as such.."
http://www.lawandterrorism.com/civil_liberties/
But eco-, human right- and civil right activists are not getting the bigger picture,
because the fundings of their biggest groups are already controlled by globalists -since decades!
They rule the agenda, they rule the topics.
And if it comes to NSA, only superficial topics are allowed to debate or instrumentalize,
often also to manipulate the idea, that democracy still exists in the U.S.
And if it comes to e-voting machines, wannabee activists ignore military and intelligence
influence into the production of these machines, supervised by Pentagon and NSA contractors
like SAIC, Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin,
Accenture (formerly a spin-off of ENRON's Arthur Andersen) and EDS.
But does that mean, all other, less organised media activists are having the better strategy?
The irony is, that also the majority of so called independent 'activists' and 'researchers'
share another thing in common: Their ignorance on google.
While many 'truthlings' praying 'google' as the holy grail for their 'breakthrough' for 9/11-research and
community creations, it's more than clear, that Google operates as yet another NSA- and NASA
front, with the only purpose to profile their users worldwide via cache results, 'google desktop',
'google calendar' and 'google earth'.
The facts are:
Google works openly with ex-NSA employee Matt Cutts (since 2000).
Google works together with the NASA.
In April 2004, google acquired one of the companies
in which CIA firm In-Q-Tel invested, @Last Software.
Google already acquired Keyhole, Inc., which was developed by In-Q-Tel as well.
The CIA doesn't care about all this?
It should therefore noone surprise, why noone wants to buy google.
If it belongs to the NSA, it will be impossible
The 9/11 truth movement community and many other false oppositions are played by the NSA.
Should THAT discourage us?
No, it shouldn't. Because we altogether still have the same chance on this very same cyber chess board.
It depends on which figure you're playing at which time.
The real tools are the 9/11 truthlings. They're also not the real "googlers".
They will not find any real clue about what's going on.
As long as the truthlings run the show,
the NSA doesn't care about more serious 'google activists
and -researchers'.
Instead they focus on the 9/11 truthling sheeple:
The NSA know every step of them and
therefore sending from time to time
new alleged false hope campaigners and gurus
into this 'movement'.
Whether it was ex-CIA firm In-Q-tel 'negotiator'
Karl Schwarz or Mike Ruppert (who himself even claims,
both parents worked for the NSA).
It still works:
A real "truthling" never questioned their 'leaders'.
And that's why General Hayden will most obviously BECOME head of the CIA,
surely after some fake debates between the democratic- and republican party,
in case they won't find someone better, who once worked for NSA, NRO or NGA.
And maybe also the one or other 9/11 truthling might point out,
that the NSA knew about 'zero hour'.
But since this is already yet another poisoned meme, this truthling might deceive another truthling to buy a book by Paul Thompson.
Meanwhile, the reorganisation of the U.S. Intelligence Apparatus is almost done.
http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.24...detail.asp
"...The first was the stacking of too many responsibilities
on the director of central intelligence (DCI),
with insufficient statutory powers.
The second was the Defense Department’s ownership
of the national intelligence agencies (the National Security Agency [NSA],
the National Reconnaissance Office [NRO], and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency [NGA]).
And the third was the FBI’s control of domestic intelligence,
or in other words, the absence of a U.S. counterpart
to Britain’s MI5 or Canada’s Security Intelligence Service..."
Welcome back to the Matrix.
The deceptions and 'distractions'
throughout all false oppositions do still work.
Don't worry about it.
There will be always another 'zero hour'
by ewing2001
Gen. Michael V. Hayden, currently Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence
has also served as Commander of the Air Intelligence Agency
and as Director of the Joint Command and Control Warfare Center.
But more important, he was also former head of the NSA (March 1999 - April 2005).
The role of the NSA regarding 9/11, and ironically also the 9/11 truth 'community',
is consequently dismissed and ignored by many '9/11 truthseekers'.
Apparently because some particular '9/11 authors'
and self appointed '9/11 activist leaders'
distracted too much with 'CIA, Cheney and the Pentagon'.
It was always clear, why.
To also delay or distract from all physical evidence, based on military operations,
scripted by the NSA and their private contractors.
The NSA, but also the NASA had their eyes not only on the 9/11 "plotline"
but also on the "military operation" of 9/11.
More closely than any other U.S. Government Agency.
The National Security Agency (NSA) has traditionally influenced
and been a very early and sophisticated user of the highest performance
of commercial computer, storage, and networking systems.
That includes also the Internet and the internet "daisy committees" of the NSA.
These are unidentified online trolls, which nicknames share different I.P. addresses,
though only impostering 'one and the same user'.
However this "user", represented with a nickname
is also able to post 24/7 on particular discussion boards, apparently without any sleep.
The NSA can also basically login and monitor all important databases of the U.S.,
especially aviation databases.
Among them the National Flight Database (NFD).
Current data elements included are:
Airports and Heliports,
Standard Terminal Arrival Procedures (STARs),
GPS and RNAV (GPS) or Runways for airports that have a SIAP coded in the NFD.
Would the NSA 'log in' on the morning on Sep11th?
Sure they would.
That's why they also know, that the BTS database of the FAA already proves,
that "AA77" and "AA11" did not exist on the morning of 9/11.
The NSA knew all alleged passengers on the morning of Sep11th.
They know this faster than the FBI or CIA.
They know which plane does exist and which doesn't.
They also know in real time, what really happened in NYC, Shanksville and
at the Pentagon, because of less stress of 'competence'.
In other words, the NSA are important part of the perpetrators who 'did 9/11'.
"The CIA did 9/11" is instead distraction language of many "9/11 truthlings",
based on a dried out old school meme of the 80s.
This meme often also includes other inane 'NWO'-drivel like endless distractions
of esoterical traps like "MK-ULTRA" or "drug business", to water down the issue.
The 'CIA-talk' often distracts on alleged on-topic 'discussion forums' with other off-topics,
which immediately deceive their online members with secondary 'research'
or even pseudo-religious agenda, new age cults and other historical sideshows.
Often "CIA researchers" find themselves quickly among associates of "TWA800 researchers"
or worse: "JFK researchers" or "moonflight hoax debunkers".
The strategy is obvious.
To distract from Sep11th with either paranoia or "80s conspiracy theories".
"The Mossad did it"-meme has a similar strategy, though it clearly distracts
with other obvious agendas, often even conflicting each other,
which has the same purpose: Divide and Conquer.
Right after 9/11, self appointed "Mossad researchers", often end up
in debates on historical research from over 2000-3000 years ago,
which is even more effective.
The 'CIA distraction' also helps to stir a fight between
the supporters of the 'mossad distraction'
and the 'CIA-NWO' sensationalists,
often also accused as "zionists", especially if you deny ANY complicity of the Mossad.
But what has 'complicity' to do with the actual performance of the inside operation?
Basically the same complicity of the so called '9/11 cover-up'
can also be easily constructed with the dutch-, german-, saudi- or pakistani intelligence.
The result is an endless debate on whether the one or other agency had more or
less participation into 9/11.
What almost noone realizes, all these 'complicities' refer in the majority to the plotline,
not the military operation.
Therefore it doesn't matter if either CIA, BND, MOSSAD, Dutch Intelligence or "Able Danger" "observed" or "impostered" the alleged hijackers.
It all represents just the 'plotline' and distracts from
the controlled demolition or the so called "controversial" TV fakery research.
(http://www.911closeup.com/nico/FAQ_planehuggers.html )
The "CIA connection" was also designed to distract from the private military-
and intelligence contractors (PMCs), which already replaced and dominated
U.S. Intelligence anyway.
Another "distraction", not less effective, is the "Bush did it" meme,
which helps to distract with post 9/11' -"scandals" of the White House or Pentagon,
to keep false hope campaigners or the complete 'anti-war movement' busy.
The same "bush did it" meme also automatically triggers other inane 'activist drivel' on prior knowledge red herrings like Jeb or Marvin Bush.
That's why also so called leftgatekeepers are still clueless about the real players
of many other new 'setups' against their own citizens:
Among them In-Q-Tel, Titan Corp., BoozAllen Hamilton, CSC/DynCorp, SAIC and many others.
The NSA has their own satellite surveillance trackers, developed by SAIC
and other private intelligence contractors.
(* see also
SAIC- power structure 9/11 and more
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/...c.php?1664)
On the morning of Sep11th, the NSA did not follow any particular standard government-
and military procedure or any other logistics, therefore cannot be accused of "negligence".
There also was no "Rumsfeld around".
Neither a silly "Rove influence", "Cheney" or "Joe Wilson",
all carefully designed limited hangout puppets.
Truthlings and Gatekeepers apparently watched too many soap operas.
If the name isn't known to them, it isn't 'cool' to talk about.
That's why more important players of the 9/11 perps never arrived
on any '9/11 truth flyer', among them:
Douglas Feith, Stephen Cambone, Jay C Davis (ANSER), James Woolsey, Ruth David,
James R. Clapper, Duane (Dewey) Clarridge, Andrew W. "Yoda" Marshall,
Scott Myers, Eliot Cohen, Christopher Demut, Thomas S. Foley,
Charles Holland, David Jeremiah, Michael Ledeen, Norman Podhoretz,
Bruce P. Jackson, the Naudet Brothers, the Club of Rome, Raytheon and many others.
That's why also the role of the NSA is underrepresented in this 'truth movement',
because much closer to the truth than anyone else.
That's why cointel-pro still succesfully runs or
deceives the biggest 'activist' groups in the 9/11 truth movement.
Anyone knows, that the Heritage Foundation runs meetup.com,
where most of the 'activists' met in the first time?
Obviously the majority doesn't.
"Profile producers" are less important than "profile paranoia".
When 'Civil Right activists' try to distract with "controversial surveillance facts" on the NSA,
they follow a clear script from their leadership groups, itself also infiltrated by government agents
or sponsored by right wing think tanks, ironically also often close to the CIA.
The same or similar pattern can be also seen in the 'alternative media'.
Often cited in this connection:
DemocracyNow!, FAIR, Nation, PBS or truthout.org.
It not only helps as a gatekeeper distraction from 9/11,
it also helps to increase the limited hangout agenda
for the political theatre.
However the role of the NSA for both 9/11 'plotline' and 'military operation',
but also 'disinformation front' and 'surveillance industry' regarding 9/11 'activists'
is much more important.
It wasn't the CIA, but apparently the NSA with their most advanced high tech,
which really was in charge of the so called "9/11 plotline".
However the official 'plotline' of 9/11 had nothing to do with the military operation.
The 'plotline' of 9/11 helped as most important distraction, even still in 2006.
While the 9/11 perpetrators used the CIA as helpful distraction idiots,
the NSA knew exactly who observed whom
in the 'plotline' and when the 'military operation' would take place:
"Tomorrow is Zero hour" (September 10th, 2001)
The alleged suspects of 9/11 met next to Fort Meade.
Also, it was ex-NSA agent Linda Mills (BENS), who lived in the same city as
some of the alleged suspects of 9/11.
And BENS helped creating the Tail to Tooth Commission,
an important tool for the neocons and PNAC.
BENS is located in front of the White House (1717 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, DC 20570).
Chairman Stanley A. Weiss is a member of the
Advisory Board of RAND's Center for Middle East
Public Policy, a member of the CFRand writes for Journal sentinel.
Members of BENS are also:
Norman R. Augustine (Director Lockheed Martin),
David S. Browning (Vice President of Schlumberger),
Daniel H. Case, III (Chase),
Rudy de Leon (Senior VP, Boeing),
Victor Ganzi (The Hearst Corporation),
Richard Grasso (New York Stock Exchange),
Frank W. Jenkins (SAIC),
Paul V. Lombardi (President and CEO of DynCorp),
Stephen T. McClellan (Merryl Lynch),
Philip A. Odeen (TRW),
Peter G. Peterson and Stephen A. Schwarzman (Blackstone Group).
Significantly, all these companies have extreme close ties
with particular elements of '9/11 research', some of them also
represent distractive issues like 'put options', 'war', 'media control' or 'oil industry'.
The "military operation" of 9/11 therefore also included a P.R. and media operation and
was a close cooperation with their very own private military- and intelligence contractors:
AMEC
AMEC renovated the wedge of the Pentagon, which 'coincidentally' was attacked on Sep11th.
Then also AMEC was in charge to remove the rubble of the Pentagon, but also from Ground Zero.
Among other contractors: Tully Inc., which subcontracted Controlled Demolotion Inc.
(* see also
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/...c.php?2173
The AMEC- Turner-WTC 7 connection)
HONEYWELL
Honeywell produced the cockpit recorder, which was officially found in Shanksville.
Two Honeywell employees 'followed' the Colgan Flight of 'Mohammad Atta'.
WESCAM
A high tech military camera system (meanwhile belonging to L3 Communications),
installed on an unidentified and prepositioned helicopter,
which filmed the only available "live" footage of the 2nd attack.
This 'footage' was then exclusively wired to W-ABC (ABC7) which synched their
final camera operator position feed 11 seconds (!) before the 2nd attack took place,
with CNN, FOX and NBC. (CBS had no 'live aired footage')
Also, it was the hangar of the NASA (NASA Glenn Research) in Cleveland,
where unidentified passengers of two U.S. flights (among them Delta 1989)
had been interrogated by the FBI.
Strangely "Delta 1989" was only forced to land in Cleveland,
because it had the same flight pattern as "United175", officially hijacked on that morning.
Oddly also the other flight was early identified as "United93",
confirmed by Mayor Michael R. White and 9News Staff (Liz Foreman),
which later denied the accurancy of their story.
The CIA (same to FBI) was also used as a distraction for the 'limited hangout' to divert
not only attention away from the NSA but also NRO and NIMA (later renamed into NGA).
The National Imagery and Mapping Agency was also known as "the 'eyes of America'
On August 8th, 2001 (two days after Bush received a new PDB with a clear warning on Bin Laden),
James R. Clapper was announced as new head of NRO.
The countdown for 9/11 continued.
These 3 intelligence agencies had been already in charge
during the mid 90s to develop a so called
'secret surveillance project', closely also linked to former Reagan's "Star Wars",
which was in reality well known,
even for U.S. Congress:
ECHELON and PROJECT TRAILBLAZER.
During 1998/1999, under Bill Clinton, the NSA and NRO handed out their first contracts of "Trailblazer"
to almost a dozen of less known private military- and intelligence contractors.
In the same years, controversy breaks out over the NSA "Echelon" project.
U.S. Congress 'figured' a problem with Echelon and looked into it.
However in 1999 both General Hayden (NSA) and George Tenet (CIA) neither denied or confirmed
the existance of Echelon and their sub contractors.
If they would have confirmed the existance of Echelon and its sub projects,
noone would have believed into negligence on the morning of Sep11th.
The denial was therefore most important, because 9/11 was already in planning.
In March 2001, Logicon TASC officially announced their five-year,
$57 million contract for "Trailblazer".
'Logicon' was in reality a team of others:
"Logicon Task Team", part of Northrop Grumman, included Veridian (in 2003 aquired by General Dynamics),
Advent Systems Inc., Mountain View, EDS, Advanced Engineering & Sciences,
RDR Inc., SRS Technologies.
Another subcontractor of Logicon TASK (diff. sp.)
became Modern Technologies Corporation (MTC) of Dayton.
MTC included Kenneth A. Minihan (ex-NSA, ex-DIA) and General Lawrence A. Skantze (ex -U.S. Air Force).
(http://inn.globalfreepress.com/modules/n...oryid=1074
The lost terror drill- Pt.11 B )
Veridian includes Neil Armstrong (former space missions during 60s).
This brings us also directly to a popular example
for an infiltration hipothesis of the 9/11 "truth" movement:
Neil Armstrong's sister is married with Jack Hoffman,
who is interestingly the uncle of '9/11 author' Jim Hoffman,
recently again accused as disinfo provocateur
(against the "Loose Change" people).
Hoffman's former institute is sponsored by the NSA, NSF and ONR (Office of Naval Research)
http://www.msri.org/people/staff/jim/
http://www.msri.org/sponaff/Support_Federal
After Jim Hoffman plagiarized his 'wtc7' research from the '9/11 science and justice alliance',
he oddly turned into a so called "planehugger"
(supportive of the idea that a plane crashed into the Pentagon,
in Shanksville and into both Twin Towers)
Back to 'Trailblazer':
Some parts of this program had been also developed in the very same wedge,
which was attacked on 9/11.
The 'pentagon attack' not only 'wiped out' the Office of Naval Intelligence,
but also three employees of James Woolsey's Booz Allen Hamilton.
Woolsey (ex-CIA director and PNAC)'s company was working on "Trailblazer".
Also killed: two employees from BTG Inc., another sub contractor of Trailblazer.
Only 10 days after Sep11th, BTG Inc. was suddenly purchased by Woolsey's other former company,
Titan Corporation.
Needless to say, Titan was another main contracter of Trailblazer
since 1998 (contracted by both NSA and NRO).
Coincidence?
What "role" did the NRO really play?
The NRO is main suspect among some '9/11 truthseekers' for the Pentagon attack,
with the cover of a live terror exercise drill on the morning of Sep11th.
Again, this also helped to re-establish the myth for an alleged commercial aircraft at the Pentagon.
A terrorist drill which was "cancelled", but in reality took place but didn't include a real plane either.
When the importance of the pre 9/11-terror drill research in general became more popular
(among them also the terror drill exercise for the anthrax attack during June 2001, "Dark Winter"),
9/11 research frauds had to establish another plagiarization and distraction:
The so called "wargames-focus" and the alleged "Cheney mastermind" role was therefore created
to divert attention away from the terror drill run-up for 9/11, and build yet another limited hangout.
Once again, the 9/11 truth movement was fooled and still is, because most of the 'wargame activists'
ended up as 'peak oil fanatics' or started to talk about 'global warming' or 'alternative energy'.
Coincidence?
Not if you know, who and why these distractions had been scripted into this movement.
It helped to delay and later control the activists of the "controlled demolition".
It helped to either discourage or depress many 'activists' in general
or keep them busy with false hope campaigns.
And it helped to distract from NSA, NGA and NRO.
The researcher who found out about all this, was labelled
as "erratic".
All other supportive associates labelled as 'wackos' or 'insane'.
Case closed. But that was 2003/04.
Why is the NRO much more important than the CIA?
The NRO was established in 1960 to develop the nation's revolutionary satellite reconnaissance systems.
It was endorsed by Dwight D. Eisenhower in February 1958
after the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the first orbital satellite.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Re...nce_Office
The existence of the NRO was declassified by the Deputy Secretary of Defense,
as recommended by the Director of Central Intelligence on September 18, 1992.
The Director of the NRO is appointed by the Secretary of Defense
with the consent of the Director of National Intelligence,
without confirmation from U.S. Congress.
(In July 2005 Donald M. Kerr was approved as new Director of the NRO)
In late 2001, "Trailblazer" (just another sub project and codename of Echelon and others)
was integrated into "Misty".
The information was still 'classified'.
Finally during December 2004, the so called 'classified' project, popped up in U.S. mainstream media.
Now described as "controversial spy satellite program" or "stealth satellite program",
it was debated by some U.S. congress members, among them Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon.
Finally General Michael Hyden (NSA) somehow confirmed, that this 'spy satellite program'
was a cooperation between the NGA (National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency), the NSA
and NRO.
Hyden also confirmed, that Lockheed was then picked as one of the main contractors
for this Satellite Surveillance program.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2...-misty.htm
On December 8, 2004, Sen. Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia,
the senior Democrat on the Intelligence Committee,
"complained" ...that the spy project was "totally unjustified and very,
very wasteful and dangerous to the national security."
Rockefeller and three other Democratic senators -
Richard Durbin of Illinois, Carl Levin of Michigan
and Ron Wyden of Oregon - refused to support this 'secret project'.
It took only 3 weeks to kill the debate and approve the project.
It was the result of an officially labelled 'natural disaster':
The Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, followed by a series of tsunamis throughout the Indian Ocean,
killing large numbers of people and devastating coastal communities in Indonesia,
Sri Lanka, India, Thailand, and elsewhere.
Meanwhile, noone in U.S. Congress,
especially 'since Katrina' argues about any 'satellite surveillance threat' anymore.
While so called 'weather modification theorists' are getting accused as 'paranoid'
and/or 'without any evidence', the coincidental timing of these events should make some people
think, especially since U.S. Congress already debating two Weather Modification Bills.
Meanwhile also Hayden has the guts to claim, "had this program been in effect prior to 9/11, it is my professional judgment that we would have detected some of the 9/11 al-Qaida operatives in the United States, and we would have identified them as such.."
http://www.lawandterrorism.com/civil_liberties/
But eco-, human right- and civil right activists are not getting the bigger picture,
because the fundings of their biggest groups are already controlled by globalists -since decades!
They rule the agenda, they rule the topics.
And if it comes to NSA, only superficial topics are allowed to debate or instrumentalize,
often also to manipulate the idea, that democracy still exists in the U.S.
And if it comes to e-voting machines, wannabee activists ignore military and intelligence
influence into the production of these machines, supervised by Pentagon and NSA contractors
like SAIC, Northrop-Grumman, Lockheed-Martin,
Accenture (formerly a spin-off of ENRON's Arthur Andersen) and EDS.
But does that mean, all other, less organised media activists are having the better strategy?
The irony is, that also the majority of so called independent 'activists' and 'researchers'
share another thing in common: Their ignorance on google.
While many 'truthlings' praying 'google' as the holy grail for their 'breakthrough' for 9/11-research and
community creations, it's more than clear, that Google operates as yet another NSA- and NASA
front, with the only purpose to profile their users worldwide via cache results, 'google desktop',
'google calendar' and 'google earth'.
The facts are:
Google works openly with ex-NSA employee Matt Cutts (since 2000).
Google works together with the NASA.
In April 2004, google acquired one of the companies
in which CIA firm In-Q-Tel invested, @Last Software.
Google already acquired Keyhole, Inc., which was developed by In-Q-Tel as well.
The CIA doesn't care about all this?
It should therefore noone surprise, why noone wants to buy google.
If it belongs to the NSA, it will be impossible
The 9/11 truth movement community and many other false oppositions are played by the NSA.
Should THAT discourage us?
No, it shouldn't. Because we altogether still have the same chance on this very same cyber chess board.
It depends on which figure you're playing at which time.
The real tools are the 9/11 truthlings. They're also not the real "googlers".
They will not find any real clue about what's going on.
As long as the truthlings run the show,
the NSA doesn't care about more serious 'google activists
and -researchers'.
Instead they focus on the 9/11 truthling sheeple:
The NSA know every step of them and
therefore sending from time to time
new alleged false hope campaigners and gurus
into this 'movement'.
Whether it was ex-CIA firm In-Q-tel 'negotiator'
Karl Schwarz or Mike Ruppert (who himself even claims,
both parents worked for the NSA).
It still works:
A real "truthling" never questioned their 'leaders'.
And that's why General Hayden will most obviously BECOME head of the CIA,
surely after some fake debates between the democratic- and republican party,
in case they won't find someone better, who once worked for NSA, NRO or NGA.
And maybe also the one or other 9/11 truthling might point out,
that the NSA knew about 'zero hour'.
But since this is already yet another poisoned meme, this truthling might deceive another truthling to buy a book by Paul Thompson.
Meanwhile, the reorganisation of the U.S. Intelligence Apparatus is almost done.
http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.24...detail.asp
"...The first was the stacking of too many responsibilities
on the director of central intelligence (DCI),
with insufficient statutory powers.
The second was the Defense Department’s ownership
of the national intelligence agencies (the National Security Agency [NSA],
the National Reconnaissance Office [NRO], and the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency [NGA]).
And the third was the FBI’s control of domestic intelligence,
or in other words, the absence of a U.S. counterpart
to Britain’s MI5 or Canada’s Security Intelligence Service..."
Welcome back to the Matrix.
The deceptions and 'distractions'
throughout all false oppositions do still work.
Don't worry about it.
There will be always another 'zero hour'