30-10-2016, 08:56 PM
There is something I wanted to add here about Anne Goodpasture, actually a couple of things. Both from Reclaiming Parkland.
All of it from the Mexico City chapter that was expurgated from the hardcover edition.
In the Lopez Report, it is obvious that when Dan and Eddie first started investigating Mexico City, Goodpasture tried to say that not only did she know very little about the audio surveillance and photographic coverage of the Cuba and USSR embassies, she tried to say she was not even aware of who actually did control them. This was a very important issue for three reasons.
1.) As we know, what the WC did with this episode was pretty much a joke. I mean, the names of Goodpasture, Phillips, and Win Scott are not even mentioned in the WR. They never interviewed Duran.
2.) What Eddie and Dan were trying to figure out was simply this: Why could the CIA not produce a photo of Oswald entering either embassy, when in fact they had to have done so if Oswald did what the WC said he did? Secondly, why was the voice on the tapes sent up by CIA--in at least one instance, specifically by Goodpasture--not Oswald's? Again, how could this be if Oswald did what the WC said he did?
3.) Why did CIA, specifically Goodpsture, send a photo of the Mystery Man to Langley instead? This guy did not even resemble Oswald at all.
In a genuine evidentiary sense, this was not just paradoxical. It was contradictory. Why? Because as Eddie and Danny figured out, there were at least a total of five cameras total trained on the two embassies. And one of them was what was called a "pulse camera", that is it was automatically activated when the air pressure fluctuated near the door. This is all contained at the beginning of the Lopez Report. A lot of people think this is boring since its all technical. But that is the point of it. It is to show how, with all those cameras, and how they covered each embassy, it is simply not possible to believe the CIA did not have a photo of Oswald. Especially since they had five passes at him. Same thing goes with the audio surveillance. Which is why there is a chart in the Lopez Report and this chart shows how the guy on the tapes does not match Oswald. Because Oswald did not speak fluent Spanish and broken Russian. It was the contrary.
All of it from the Mexico City chapter that was expurgated from the hardcover edition.
In the Lopez Report, it is obvious that when Dan and Eddie first started investigating Mexico City, Goodpasture tried to say that not only did she know very little about the audio surveillance and photographic coverage of the Cuba and USSR embassies, she tried to say she was not even aware of who actually did control them. This was a very important issue for three reasons.
1.) As we know, what the WC did with this episode was pretty much a joke. I mean, the names of Goodpasture, Phillips, and Win Scott are not even mentioned in the WR. They never interviewed Duran.
2.) What Eddie and Dan were trying to figure out was simply this: Why could the CIA not produce a photo of Oswald entering either embassy, when in fact they had to have done so if Oswald did what the WC said he did? Secondly, why was the voice on the tapes sent up by CIA--in at least one instance, specifically by Goodpasture--not Oswald's? Again, how could this be if Oswald did what the WC said he did?
3.) Why did CIA, specifically Goodpsture, send a photo of the Mystery Man to Langley instead? This guy did not even resemble Oswald at all.
In a genuine evidentiary sense, this was not just paradoxical. It was contradictory. Why? Because as Eddie and Danny figured out, there were at least a total of five cameras total trained on the two embassies. And one of them was what was called a "pulse camera", that is it was automatically activated when the air pressure fluctuated near the door. This is all contained at the beginning of the Lopez Report. A lot of people think this is boring since its all technical. But that is the point of it. It is to show how, with all those cameras, and how they covered each embassy, it is simply not possible to believe the CIA did not have a photo of Oswald. Especially since they had five passes at him. Same thing goes with the audio surveillance. Which is why there is a chart in the Lopez Report and this chart shows how the guy on the tapes does not match Oswald. Because Oswald did not speak fluent Spanish and broken Russian. It was the contrary.