03-11-2016, 09:17 AM
(This post was last modified: 03-11-2016, 11:14 AM by David Guyatt.)
I agree that great care is needed with this Youtube video, Lauren. It is very curious indeed.
Meanwhile, harking back to my days of mind control research, there never was any evidence that Project Monarch was real or part of MK-ULTRA umbrella programme. I remember (and this was about 2 decades ago) that Martin Cannon (who led the mind control research field at the time) looked into these Monarch stories and came away convinced the whole thing was fabricated by Phillips and O'Brien.
I believe I'm right in saying there is no CIA or other US intelligence documentation suggesting otherwise.
I remain utterly certain that Julian Assange is no more mind controlled than I am. And during several years of investigation into the subject I met or spoke to several people who claimed that honour. Assange is far too rational and objective. In fact, I would say that the story he has been subject to such a programme very clearly was designed to damage his credibility.
PS, I tried to find an essay from Martin about Monarch in LOBSTER (see HERE) where Martin raises the spectre in the first place. In looking back I think it was probably a series of correspondence I had with him about Monarch that he made his views known. However, it is quite easy to gain a brief peek into LOBSTER's editor, Robin Ramsay's perspective. In his typical direct manner, Robin eviscerates Jim Keith's book "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness" in LOBSTER 41. The magazine is locked behind a paywall for digital copies, so here's the breif summary of Robin's book review:
Meanwhile, harking back to my days of mind control research, there never was any evidence that Project Monarch was real or part of MK-ULTRA umbrella programme. I remember (and this was about 2 decades ago) that Martin Cannon (who led the mind control research field at the time) looked into these Monarch stories and came away convinced the whole thing was fabricated by Phillips and O'Brien.
I believe I'm right in saying there is no CIA or other US intelligence documentation suggesting otherwise.
I remain utterly certain that Julian Assange is no more mind controlled than I am. And during several years of investigation into the subject I met or spoke to several people who claimed that honour. Assange is far too rational and objective. In fact, I would say that the story he has been subject to such a programme very clearly was designed to damage his credibility.
PS, I tried to find an essay from Martin about Monarch in LOBSTER (see HERE) where Martin raises the spectre in the first place. In looking back I think it was probably a series of correspondence I had with him about Monarch that he made his views known. However, it is quite easy to gain a brief peek into LOBSTER's editor, Robin Ramsay's perspective. In his typical direct manner, Robin eviscerates Jim Keith's book "Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness" in LOBSTER 41. The magazine is locked behind a paywall for digital copies, so here's the breif summary of Robin's book review:
Quote: Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness (Book review)[Lobster #41 (Summer 2001)]Source
... his sources for this? John Coleman, he of the 'Committee of 300' fantasies, and writers from La Rouche's EIR. Even worse, we get 30 pages on Project Monarch, the alleged CIA sex-slave mind control programme, and first-hand accounts from some of Monarch's alleged subjects. This is all total twaddle. There is no evidence of ... existence and Keith provides none. The testimony of the likes of Brice Taylor, given a chapter here, is manifestly nonsense. For reasons I don't understand, Keith is unwilling to say this, even when the 'subjects' of these 'experiments' utter things like this (p. 169): 'I was part of the Illuminati function within ...
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14