27-09-2009, 05:26 PM
Peter Presland Wrote:A couple of things have been gnawing away at me this last week, both of which fit this threads heading and neither of which has been discussed here yet - or if they have I've missed it and apologise. So here goes:
1. The UN General assembly meeting; specifically Ahmadinejad's address and the response to it. A number of Western representatives - mainly from the Echellon countries and their surrogates - walked out on cue. The Daily Telegraph reporting of the matter was typical - "Britain walks out of Iran's Ahmadinejad's anti-Semitic speech at UN" was the headline. A US State Department spokesman accused Ahmadinejad of using “hateful, offensive and anti-Semitic rhetoric”. Stephen Harper said Ahmadinejad had said “absolutely repugnant” things about Israel.
Whereas the speech did not contain the words 'Jewish' or 'Holocaust' at all. the word 'Jews' appeared just once as in "....preparing a conducive ground for all Palestinian populations, including Muslims, Christians and Jews to live together in peace and harmony...”
Here is the 'hatefully repugnant' part that prompted the walk out:
Quote:"How can one imagine that the inhuman policies in Palestine may continue; to force the entire population of a country out of their homeland for more than 60 years by resorting to force and coercion; to attack them with all types of arms and even prohibited weapons; to deny them of their legitimate right of self-defense, while much to the chagrin of the international community calling the occupiers as the peacelovers, and portraying the victims as terrorists. How can the crimes of the occupiers against defenceless women and children and destruction of their homes, farms, hospitals and schools be supported unconditionally by certain governments, and at the same time, the oppressed men and women be subject to genocide and heaviest economic blockade being denied of their basic needs, food, water and medicine. They are not even allowed to rebuild their homes which were destroyed during the 22-day barbaric attacks by the Zionist regime while the winter is approaching. Whereas the aggressors and their supporters deceitfully continue their rhetoric in defense of human rights in order to put others under pressure. It is no longer acceptable that a small minority would dominate the politics, economy and culture of major parts of the world by its complicated networks, and establish a new form of slavery, and harm the reputation of other nations, even European nations and the U.S., to attain its racist ambitions."Raw anti-semitism eh? Talk about Orwellian doublespeak! Do these guys actually believe their semantic inanities I wonder?
Israel is a flag of convenience for the Anglo-Americans, Peter. The quo for the quid is the Israeli downplaying of who enabled and financed Hitler. The silence of the Zionist lobby on this subject permits state propagandists from both countries -in the UK, for example, Andrew Roberts, the equally ludicrous Christopher Andrew etc - to manufacture a narrative which has the Anglo-Americans claim they fought totalitarianism of both shades, red and brown, throughout the 20th century.
When Israel has served its purpose, the Anglo-Americans will shed Israel with all the sentiment of a snake contemplating an old skin.
As for Brown's speech-reaction to the non-revelation, the man is a joke, and his words without a shred of credibility. But then you know that.